I think the last thing I saw with Charlize Theron was Men of Honor. I’ve still never seen Monster.
Via Bold Method, a very nice little film featuring some European airshow action. Go full screen, it’s worth it.
Pentagon leaders often speak of the need for disruptive technologies in the Fleet to mitigate the risks of shrinking defense budgets, declining U.S. military technological superiority and improving adversary capabilities. Last week, a remarkable example of disruptive innovation occurred. How did the Navy react? It simply reaffirmed its unimaginative plan to send its carrier-launched drone to the boneyard—and potentially sentence the aircraft carrier to a similar fate.
The Navy’s test carrier drone, the X-47B UCAS-D (Unmanned Combat Air System Demonstrator), recently participated in the first-ever fully autonomous aerial refueling at Naval Air Station Patuxent River. Though the implications of this engineering feat are wide-ranging and not wholly known at this point, successful demonstration of unmanned aerial refueling does shed light on several ongoing arguments about the future of U.S. military aviation.
We’re always hesitant to match wits with Mackenzie and Bryan, two very smart people, who make a living at this sort of thing.
But we wish to remind them, and you, dear reader, that the X-47B was just what its name says, a demonstrator. That is, it was specifically designed and engineered to demonstrate five capabilities. First, autonomous flight. Second, operations on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier. Third, launch from an aircraft carrier’s catapults. Fourth, the ability to land on an aircraft carrier. Finally, to autonomously conduct aerial refueling.
It has done all five tasks, though let us note that each was done in near perfect conditions, and not the worst case scenarios of weather or other operational environments that any fleet platform would face.
But that is all the X-47B was designed to do. The leap from a technology demonstrator to a deployable combat assets is vast.
We would remind Mackenzie and Bryan of the X-35 JSF demonstrator, a platform visually almost indistinguishable from the F-35 fighter. The X-35 was a technology demonstrator as well. It first flew in 2000. Here we are a decade and a half later, and its progeny, the F-35, is still not quite to its Initial Operational Capability.
There is a growing fight within the Naval Air community over what the operational UCLASS (Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike) platform should focus on. There is a strong school of thought in NavAir that the emphasis should be on the surveillance part, not the strike part. That puts them at odds with people like John McCain, who’s powerful position on the Senate Armed Services Committee gives him an outsized voice on what is to come. McCain and others see little point to a platform that isn’t designed to address anti-access/area denial threats from China and other potential adversaries.
Those threats are very much in the mind of the folks at NavAir. Their argument is that a surveillance focus is technologically feasible now, and the design and operational deployment of such a platform would be relatively quick and painless. And that operational deployment would provide the real world experience and lessons learned that would made future evolutionary strike variants much more likely to be successful, all while addressing one of the critical shortcomings of today’s Hornet centric airwing.
We tend to side with the less ambitious crowd arguing for a surveillance emphasis.
So, a company called Protein World started using this ad.
And of course the Feminist SJWs got the vapors. Which, Protein World, rather than engaging in endless self abasement, stood firm.
Grow up, Harriet.
Old folks, people my age, remember just how bizarre it was that Predator drones in Afghanistan and Iraq began carrying and using Hellfire missiles to target high ranking terrorists. It seems pretty revolutionary to conduct remote control warfare.
But it isn’t as though the idea had never occurred to anyone before.
During the Vietnam War, one of the most challenging, dangerous missions was that of the Wild Weasels. Tasked with suppressing the radars and missile launchers of SA-2 Guideline SAM batteries, modified F-105F and F-105G fighter bombers played a deadly game of cat and mouse with the radar operators of the People’s Army of North Vietnam.
The losses among Weasels were always high, and bright minds wanted to find a way to reduce the risk to aircrews. Someone in the Air Force noticed that Ryan Firebee drones routinely had to be augmented with radar reflectors and thermal flares to accurately portray fighter sized aircraft, in terms of radar returns. It made sense then, that if these features were removed, it would be somewhat difficult to actually track the Firebee drones, say, by the Vietnamese. Firebee drones had routinely been used as reconnaissance assets over North Vietnam. The next logical step was to arm them to attack SAM batteries, thus keeping Weasel crews out of the worst of the danger, while still suppressing the SAMs enough to allow the main strike packages to reach their targets.
There’s a couple of nice splodeys in there.
To the best of my knowledge, this capability was never used operationally. But ever since Vietnam, there has been intense interest in less conventional methods of suppressing enemy air defenses. One wonders what secrets in the field are still to be revealed.
The Russians are always big on big parades of military hardware. And the 70th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day is a fine excuse for a parade. And of course, the military being the military, they have to hold a rehearsal.
I thought adding in the T-34 tanks was an especially nice touch.
By way of contrast, you’ll notice the US pretty much never does anything like this. Can you imagine the 1st Armored Division rolling through DC just to show off?
Today marks another significant centennial of the Great War. (Yesterday marked the centenary of beginning of the Armenian Genocide.) The ANZAC landings at Gallipoli took place on 25 April 1915. It is a very special ANZAC Day. From last year:
Today is the 25th of April. It is ANZAC Day, commemorating the 99th anniversary of the landings of 31,000 men of The Australian Division, and the Australian-New Zealand Division (reinforced with two batteries of mountain guns) on the crescent-shaped portion of beach known as Ari Burnu, forever after known as Anzac Cove.
The ANZAC landing began before dawn on 25 April 1915, and was initially unopposed, By mid-morning, however, Turkish troops under LtCol Mustapha Kemal had reacted strongly and taken the landing beaches and the precariously shallow Dominion positions under rifle, machine gun, and artillery fire. Unable to move forward, and hanging onto hillside rocks and scrapes, ANZAC Commander MajGen Sir William Birdwood asked to have the beach-head evacuated.
The Royal Navy argued that such an evacuation, particularly under fire, was impractical. So Birdwood was ordered to stay, with the advice given by General Sir Ian Hamilton to “dig, dig, dig!”. It is from this message, many conclude, that the ANZACs became known as the “diggers”. Despite herculean efforts and near-suicidal courage, including the tragically costly landings at Sulva Bay in August of 1915, the stalemate was never broken. Unable to advance, with no evacuation possible, the ANZACs remained locked in their initial positions, enduring conditions even more horrendous than those on the Western Front, until finally pulled out as a part of the general evacuation of the Gallipoli Operation in December of 1915.
ANZAC Day has become a day of remembrance for all Australian and New Zealand war dead, but remains especially poignant for the nearly 13,000 Australian and New Zealand soldiers who gave their lives in the foothills of the Bari Sair Mountains, in the eight months of hell on Earth that was Anzac Cove.
At the going down of the sun,
and in the morning,
we will remember them.