Category Archives: history

James Gandolfini, “Sopranos” Star and Maker of “Alive Day Memories” Dies at 51

Paul Morigi

We know him as Tony Soprano, the somewhat neurotic patriarch of the New Jersey crime family, whose own mother once put out a hit on him.  James Gandolfini had been in a bunch of other films, his first memorable role being hit-man Virgil in True Romance.

News has come that he has died at 51, of an apparent heart attack, while vacationing in Italy.

Among the other projects Gandolfini was known for was HBO’s Alive Day Memories, a film of touching and inspirational interviews with US service members severely wounded in Iraq.   Unlike a goodly portion of the Hollywood crowd, Gandolfini was by all accounts a decent guy, and his interaction with the Veterans he interviewed for the HBO special was eminently genuine.  I viewed the film not long after its release, at a VA Scholars conference, and an attendee that was a part of making the film said Mr. Gandolfini was often in tears, and expressed unbound admiration for the Wounded Warriors he interviewed, both on and off camera.

A shame.  Far too young, and, it seems, one of the good guys.

About these ads

Leave a Comment

Filed under Afghanistan, Air Force, army, Around the web, guns, history, iraq, marines, navy, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Obama’s War On Religion: Religious Education is “Divisive”

obama-double-finger-point-ap

There have been a growing number of people who are beginning to see the landscape being shaped by the far-left secular progressives in this country and others for what it is.

It is a war of religion.  And a war ON religion.  The religion of the secular progressives is the religion of the State.  The State provides.  It grants liberties.  It is the thing we all belong to.   It is supreme.  We are measured not as individuals, but by what we do as a collective.  ”Together”.   Collective guilt.  Collective responsibility.  The needs of the many.   It is the religion, also, of tyranny, oppression, and persecution.

The idea that our Creator endowed us with Unalienable Rights is anathema to the secular progressives.  Our Bill of Rights, as we have seen very clearly of late, comprise mere words on a page, to be amended or discarded to further aggrandize the authority of the State.

Other religions, especially Christianity, which are built on the foundations of the dignity of a single human life, are incompatible with such a religion as the worship of the State.   At every turn, this Administration and those that serve as its intellectual underpinning, has sought to marginalize and destroy religious worship in this country.   Catholic institutions forced to provide birth control.  Chaplains forbidden from praying in Jesus’ name.   Political opposition demonized and ridiculed, as ignorant hillbillies clinging to “guns and God”.

When one watches closely, there are glimpses behind the veil.    Obama made the following remarks in Northern Ireland at the G8 Conference:

“If towns remain divided—if Catholics have their schools and buildings and Protestants have theirs, if we can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation,”

So, it seems, parochial schools have to go.   The education, nay the RAISING of children, should not happen outside the grip of government.  As you might be aware, home schoolers in America are commonly described as “extremist” for not wanting the mediocre and doctrinaire public schools to contaminate their children.   And religious education is divisive.  As opposed to the inclusiveness of Diversity, and the endless something-or-other-pride months which celebrate everyone except straight white males.

Pay attention.  This is the “Change” he promised.  If you insist on bleating (yet again) that Obama’s remarks were somehow taken out of context, you have crossed over into the category of willful blindness.

“We are no longer a Christian Nation.”   That was less a comment than a promise.

The most cogent comment is on a linked blog by Father Z.

Off the top of my head, I can’t think of a foreign visit to a Islamic nation where he told people on his arrival that they shouldn’t have madrasas.  Can you?

No, Father.  I cannot.  Nobody else can, either.  His Secretary of State’s admonition that the First Amendment should not be used to denigrate the beliefs of another was oh-so typical of the secular left.  Christianity is fair game.  Islam?  The holiest of holies.  Behind, of course, the religion of the all-powerful and all-providing State.

Tyranny around every corner, indeed.   We are moving, not just drifting, away from Jefferson and toward Hobbes.  Our “We the People” is becoming Leviathan.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized, Around the web, Politics, obama, islam, war, history, veterans

Load HEAT- Natasha Fatale

natasha3

Has there ever been a hotter babe holding a round bomb with a lit fuze?  I don’t think so.   From her insanely high heels to her thick (suspiciously Muscovite) Pottsylvanian accent, she is 100% real woman.

natasha_picture_1

natashafatale_09

Hey, if you can be played by Sally Kellerman and Renee Russo on the silver screen, you gotta be doing something right.  And when a gorgeous 21st Century Russian spy is invariably compared to you, you are an ICON.

natasha

boris_and_natasha_1[1]

natasha-157x300

No question about it.  Even though she was always perpetrating evil for Fearless Leader and Mister Big, whether it is stealing Upsidaisium or fixing football games with Wossamotta U, she was one of the hottest things about the Cold War.   Even if fiendish plan had fiendish plan.

nat

4 Comments

Filed under girls, history, Humor, Uncategorized, war

Operation End Sweep (part 1)

CH-53 MK-105 Sled

AN HM-12 CH-53D tows a MK 105 sled during Operation End Sweep

On 8 May 1972, as part of Operation Pocket Money (itself a part of Operation Rolling Thunder), 3 A-6 Intruders (from VMA(AW)-224) and 6 A-7 Corsairs (from VA-22 and VA-94) launched from the USS Coral Sea (CV-43) to deploy mines within the vicinity of Haiphong Harbor in North Vietnam.

map-viet

An illustration of the Southeast Asia are of Operations.

The A-6 flight led by the CAG (Commander, Carrier Air Wing), Commander Roger Sheets, was composed of USMC aircraft from VMA-224 and headed for the inner channel. The A-7Es, led by Commander Len Giuliani and made up of aircraft from VA-94 and VA-22, were designated to mine the outer segment of the channel. Each aircraft carried four MK 52-2 mines. Captain William Carr, USMC, the bombardier navigator in the lead plane established the critical attack azimuth and timed the mine releases. The first mine was dropped at 090859H and the last of the field of 36 mines at 090901H.

3_8

A-6A Intruder from VMA(AW)-224.

Twelve mines were placed in the inner segment and the remaining 24 in the outer segment. All MK 52-2 mines were set with 72-hour arming delays, thus permitting merchant ships time for departure or a change in destination consistent with the President’s public warning. It was the beginning of a mining campaign that planted over 11,000 MK 36 type destructor and 108 special MK 52-2 mines over the next eight months. It is considered to have played a significant role in bringing about an eventual peace arrangement, particularly since it so hampered the enemy’s ability to continue receiving war supplies.

Operation Rolling Thunder itself served as a way to get the North Vietnamese back to the negotiating table in Paris. Prior to Operation Pocket Money, the US Navy planning offices had studied minesweeping operations off Haiphong but the assets to conduct minesweeping were not properly maintained.  However some sweeping had taken place off Saigon in preparation for a non-combatant evacuation. Most of the minesweeping assets in theatre were devoted to Operation Market Time in South Vietnam. Most of the minesweeping equipment dated from the Korean War era. In 1970 the US Navy had made a decision to place more emphasis of minesweeping from helicopters due to the increasing cost of MSO (ocean-going minesweepers).

There were about 8 months between the time that CINCPAC (Commander-In-Chief Pacific) had received orders to begin minesweeping and the time the task force remained on-station to conduct sweeping operations. This allowed time for development of equipment, tactics and training.

Between the dates of May 9-11 of 1972, as assessment of problems was conducted. There were no oceanographic charts of the operational area off Haiphong, there was no data to give accurate predictions of equipment losses that could occur during operations, there was a lack of specialized personnel and training (both in the officer and enlisted ranks).

In 1972 mine countermeasures for both the Atlantic and Pacific Fleets were combined was under one type commander – Commander Mine Warfare Force, based in Charleston, South Carolina. What follows is a list of operational resources that were in this organization:

-One Mobile Mine Countermeasures Command (MOMCOM). This was the command structure to provide worldwide airborne and other support of minesweeping operations.

-Three Mine Flotillas. Each Flotilla was composed of a number of MSOs.

-One Helicopter minesweeping squadron. Helicopter Minesweeping Squadron 12 (HM-12) was the airborne component to the task force.

-One squadron of minesweeping boats (MSB and MSL).

-One Mine Force Support Group. They were responsible for training and equipping personnel for minesweeping operations.

HM-12 was equipped with 12 CH-53Ds. 2 of the helos were in use at the Naval Coastal Systems Laboratory. The CH-53Ds were on loan from the USMC and were configured with towing strong points required for mine countermeasures towing.

image013

HM-12 patch

These helos towed the MK-103 gear for sweeping moored mines, the MK-104 gear for acoustic mines and MK-105 hydrofoil for sweeping magnetic mines.

mk-105 minesweeping sled

Schematic drawing of the MK-105 minesweeping sled, showing the major components of the device.

Other airborne assets that didn’t necessarily belong to MOMCOM but were tasked to them were USAF C-5A Galaxies that were used to airlift the CH-53Ds to the theatre.

800px-USS_Constant_(AM-427)

An example of an MSO used during Operation End Sweep, the USS Constant (MSO-427).

Most of the surface born mine sweeping assets were the 172 ocean minesweeper (MSOs). By 1972 most of these ships were 13 to 19 years of age with 5 in the Western Pacific, 17 on the west coast and 11 on the east coast another 17 were in the Naval Reserve Forces and 13 were in an inactive status.  14 of these MSOs had received new engines to improve their useful lives and decrease the maintenance necessary for effective operation. Other vessels were the eleven 144 foot coastal minesweepers and nineteen 57-foot minesweeping boats.

The minefields off Haiphong were too shallow for sweeping operations by any of these types of vessels. However sensors towed by these vessels like the AN\SQO-14 sonar gave these vessels the ability to map the bottom of the ocean at sufficient resolution to detect mines. The only capability these vessels had to dispose of the mines were EOD divers.

The Naval Scientific Assistance Program (NASP), provided solutions to problems of immediate concern. For example, the NASP developed simulators for use in training and automated minesweeping planning software. As a side note, the NASP expressed a concern of solar flare activity in August of 1972. NASP thought these flares caused a large number of mine detonations of Destructor mines in US minefields off North Vietnam.

There were other problems concerning preparation for Operation End Sweep. Among them being a general lack of funds for training and equipment (which admittedly was a problem throughout all US forces at the time. Problems specific to minesweeping forces detailed to Operation End Sweep were reliability problems for degaussing, sonar (AN/SQO-14), and engines on the MSOs. There was no equipment for precision navigation and mapping of minefields. There was no oceanographic data for sea floor in the vicinity of Haiphong. The was no protection for the CH-53Ds that were involved in minesweeping.

HM-12 conducted training from May to November 1972 off of Charleston, South Carolina. The CH-53Ds operated from an LPD (Landing Platform Dock) and crews learned how to rig the minesweeping equipment to the helo. LCVPs (Land Craft Vehicle and Personnel or “Higgins Boat”) carried the MK-105 sleds to the waiting hovering helos. The sleds were then attached to the towing strong points on the aircraft.

Training of both surface and air forces for Operation End Sweep as done off of Panama City, Florida. Most of these tests were to test the accuracy of the Raydist. EOD teams also conducted training with surface minesweeping forces.

On 6 November 1972, Task Force 78 deployed to Subic Bay in the Philippines. Forces kept a low profile on base because TF-78 was being used as a bargaining chip in the Paris peace talks. The CH-53Ds were deployed to Subic via USAF C-5 Galaxy.

In January 1973 the Paris Peace Treaty was about to be signed and TF-78 forces ramped up training. Crews from HMM-165 trained with HM-12 aboard the USS Ogden and USS Dubuque. MSOs USS FortifyUSS ForceUSS Impervious and USS Engage began sweeping the anchorage for the TF, some approaches to Haiphong. Operations were being monitored by the Soviet Intelligence Collection Ship, Protractor.

By 26 February, airborne units from HM-12 were ready to be deployed aboard ships. HM-12 was divided into 4 detachments, each aboard 4 ships in the task group. Dets Alpha and Bravo embarked aboard the USS Ogden, USS Dubuque, and USS New Orleans. Dets Charlie and Delta embarked aboard the USS Inchon (LPD-12) and USS Cleveland (LPH-7).

General planning for sweeping operations in Haiphong actually started in 1972 as part of general contigency planning on the part of JCS. By mid-1972 however clearing the mines in Haiphong become a diplomatic issue at the Paris Peace Talks. The initial planning for End Sweep were known as Formation Sentry I and Formation Sentry II. These plans differed from End Sweep through the numbers and assets to be used. The Sentry plans were completed by 1972 but held ready by CINCPACFLT (Commander-In-Chief Pacific Fleet).

Imputes to expand Formation Sentry I into Formation II occurred because of what became known as the Warrington incident in June and July 1972. While conducting naval bombardment 10 to 20 miles northeast of Dong Hoi, the USS Warrington was damaged by an underwater explosion that was determined to have been possibly caused by a Destructor mine laid as a result of an aircraft navigation error.

This incident led the JCS (Joint Chiefs of Staff) to determine that MSOs were particularly suited to ocean-sweeping operations in this area and prompted a danger zone to be established in the area. The area was never swept because a Naval Oceanographic team was trying to survey the area and was fired on by shore batteries. The area was never cleared (except for the self-destruction of the mine). The Warrington incident did bring increased interest of Minesweeping to the JCS and the appropriate planning offices were notified.

748px-Task_Force_78_Gulf_of_Tonkin

Ships of Task Force 78 at anchor in the Gulf of Tonkin.

By 24 November 1972 Task Force 78 (TF-78) was activated. TF-78 consisted of the following:

-Surface Support Group (Task Group 78.0) consisting of LPH and LPD types to serve as helicopter platforms and supporting ships such as the fleet ocean tug and salvage ship. Five helicopter platforms were available plus a flagship-maintenance platform. An amphibious squadron commander led the Surface Support Group.

-Mobile Mine Countermeasures Group (Task Group 78.1) the airborne group, contained the 4 airborne units (A,B,C,D), the special minesweeper Washtenaw County and various other units. Commander TG-78.1 was in overall command of sweeping in coastal and port areas.

-Surface Mine Countermeasures Group (Task Group 78.2) consisted of the 10 MSOs assigned to End Sweep. TG-78.2 acted as control ships for the helo minesweeping operations.

-Advanced Base Mine Countermeasures Group (Task Group 78.3) was stationed at Subic Bay. This group provided maintenance, repair and supply to the entire task group; trained Marines in MCM and coordinated installation of sweeping kits and the Swept Mine Locator Camera System on the helicopters. Civilian technical representative from the various contractors were also part of this group.

-Contingency Mine Countermeasures Group (Task Group 78.4) was activated later and primarily responsible for sweeping the inland waterways in North Vietnam. They were also primarily responsible for supervising North Vietnamese sweep personnel.

-Salvage Group (Task Group 78.5) was responsible for finding and disposing buried mines in the Haiphong Channel.

On 27 January, MSOs began sweeping the anchorages of Haiphong where the main ship in TF-78 would be operating. On the 29th, the Paris Peace Agreement was formally signed by representatives from the United States, The Republic of Vietnam, The Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the National Liberation Front.

By May of 1972, the largest mine countermeasures force the world had ever seen, up to that time, had assembled and was ready for action.

In the next part of this series we’ll get into the minesweeping equipment used in Operation End Sweep and the operation itself.

This was my first attempt to tell some “non-aviation” history that I felt needed to be told.  If I’ve missed something or said something in error as usual you feedback is more than welcome.

 

6 Comments

Filed under helicopters, history, navy

More on SS Henry B. Smith

URR wrote about finding the wreck of the SS Henry B. Smith.

Alert reader and good friend Bill (note *I* refrained from saying “old” friend) sends along these reports from the newspapers of the day.
1913 11 14 Cleveland Leader p 1
1913 11 14 Cleveland Leader p 2
1913 11 14 Cleveland Plain Dealer p 1
1913 11 14 Cleveland Plain Dealer p 2

Thanks, Bill!

2 Comments

Filed under history

The War on Women

ap560794545632-ab21003384832e5f3fb85a40086af24279a44f69-s6-c30

It is real.  Bloody, savage, waged without remorse.

Sandra Fluke would tell you that the “War on Women” consists of not receiving free birth control from a Roman Catholic institution of higher learning.   Barbara Boxer would tell you that Pro-Life groups and not Kermit Gosnell are the problem.

Kirstie Gillinbrand believes the “War on Women” is being waged by male service members and misogynist commanders, and is willing to dispense with anything resembling objective justice to punish the accused.  (With the backing of the Commander in Chief, it would seem.)

Hillary Clinton, who, on the day an Ambassador was murdered by Islamist extremists told us that free speech should not be used to disparage someone’s religion (Crucifix in a jar of urine notwithstanding), wanted to make “Women’s Rights” a cornerstone of US foreign policy.

But the War on Women rages on.  Honor killings continue, even in this country.  Schools blown up, acid thrown in the faces of the innocent, mutilations.  Unspeakable violence and oppression against women, perpetrated by the very same Islamist ideology that has vowed to destroy America.    Yet these above-mentioned women and those of their ilk remain strangely silent on the subject of the ghastly and terrible existence women endure in the lands controlled by these cowardly and ignorant brutes.   The silence in the mainstream media, usually the trumpeter of all things feminist, is positively thunderous.  

Soon, Nelson Mandela, at 94 and seriously ill, will be eulogized far and wide for being willing to fight not to have his people relegated to second class status.   Those same people who will praise him the loudest cannot seem to utter a meaningful sound regarding the brutalizing and virtual enslavement of women and girls in the lands under the thumb of radical Islam.  They cannot, in fact, even bring themselves to identify our enemies for what they are, Islamic extremists, for fear of offending.

That they do not is hypocrisy.  That they dare not, is cowardice.

9 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, Around the web, girls, history, islam, marines, navy, obama, Politics, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Fifty Years Ago, June 12th, 1963, First Vietnam Buddhist Immolates Self in Protest of Diem Regime

vietnamese_buddhist_monk_1963_622

The event was captured by Associated Press photographer Malcolm Browne.  Buddhist Monks protested the religious persecution they were suffering at the hands of the Catholic government of Ngo Dinh Diem.

To that point, Vietnam was a little-known Southeast Asian country in which the French had fought and lost a shadowy war in the 1950s, but remained largely obscure to any but the Cold War strategists of both sides of the Iron Curtain.   The “Buddhist Crisis”, exemplified by Browne’s grisly and iconic photo, placed Vietnam squarely in the world headlines, where it would stay for the next dozen years.

5 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, history, marines, navy, Politics, veterans, war

CHINFO Uses the “F-word”

Old-Ironsides

Frigate.  Over at Information Dissemination.  He calls LCS a “light frigate, a corvette”, noting ”I never understood why we didn’t just call it that in the first place”.  Neither did many of the rest of us.

In fact, stridently denying that LCS was to replace the FFG-7s at the lower end of the “hi-lo” mix when it was obvious to everyone that was almost certainly the role it would fill, didn’t do anything for the credibility of the US Navy nor those pushing LCS.

Admiral Kirby makes a number of historical references to unproven ship design, including the Six Frigates, and USS Monitor.  Whatever else those “experimental” vessels were, they were powerfully-armed and were well-protected.   Those are precisely the areas LCS is found most wanting.  Both designs are fragile and woefully under-armed.

Anyway, read Admiral Kirby’s assertions.  He makes some valid points, but you can be the judge of just how many, and just how valid.

2 Comments

Filed under Around the web, Artillery, guns, history, navy, Uncategorized, war

Driving A Car As Stressful As Skydiving?

CBS says so.  But boy, I dunno.  Although the byline is “Cambridge, MA”, which means driving in Boston, with the dearth of street signs, and traffic patterns made for oxcarts and not automobiles…   I think my favorite is the three-hour traffic jams on I-93 South for no particular reason.

traffic_jam

Of course, there’s always the “T”.  But getting to the stations is a pain in the ass.  And there is always the chance you will never return.  So yeah, driving can be stressful, especially in the Hub, where the majority of Mass-holes seem to have an irrational phobia of turn signals.   Were you to descend while skydiving at the same rate traffic moves in Boston on any given afternoon, you might not hit terra firma for an hour or two.    So maybe CBS has a point.

6 Comments

Filed under Around the web, history, Humor, Personal, Uncategorized

Wreckage of Ore Freighter SS Henry B. Smith Located in Lake Superior

article-2338735-1A3BF70C000005DC-525_634x365

Once upon a time, too many years ago to be believed, a lovely young lady and dear friend who grew up in Michigan gave me the book “Went Missing”, by Frederick Stonehouse.  It is one of my favorite books, and I have read it numerous times, and absolutely cherish it.   One of the vessels of which Stonehouse writes so compellingly is the ore freighter SS Henry B. Smith, which vanished with her crew of 25 in the Great Storm of November, 1913.   It appears certain she has been, at long last, found:

The group says it hasn’t seen the name of the ship on the wreck yet, but all signs indicate it’s the Smith, sitting amid a spilled load of iron ore.  ’It’s the most satisfying find of my shipwreck-hunting career,’ said Jerry Eliason, of Cloquet, part of the group that has found many lost ships in recent years.  ’It’s a fantastic find,’ said maritime historian Frederick Stonehouse, of Marquette, who has written about the Smith.

henryb

SS Henry B. Smith was no small wooden schooner, but a steel-hulled steam-driven freighter of 6,500 tons and 525 feet.  She was only seven years old, a modern and sturdy ore carrier of a basic design type which still serves the Great Lakes a hundred years on.   She was last sighted in the teeth of the storm of 9-10 November 1913, turning to port, rolling heavily.  Speculation was that her Captain was running for the shelter of Keeweenaw Point.  But that was the last anyone saw of the freighter or its crew.  Smith vanished.  That she was lost was confirmed by wreckage washing up along the beach, and the body of her cook was found floating a few days later.

And now, she is found, in remarkably good condition, apparently.   The Great Storm of 1913 claimed the lives of more than 250 mariners on the Lakes.   For these 25 souls, at least, the mystery of their final trials can be solved.

h/t Buttercup

10 Comments

Filed under Around the web, history, Uncategorized

The Disturbing Case of Master Sergeant Sommers

Back in 2010, when then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen outlined to Congress his unsolicited personal beliefs to be the moral guidepost for military service, a number of people believed such unprecedented personal commentary from a senior officer to be embarking on a very dangerous and slippery slope toward the crafting of a military in which an increasingly leftist ideology would be the only acceptable belief system those serving in uniform.   I was among those who saw such perils in Mullen’s self-indulgent and unprofessional edict.

It was no coincidence, of course.  The Armed Forces is the one major societal institution in America that is not in fall-behind, genuflecting obedience to the Secular-Progressive Far Left.  Our education system, secondary and higher, is overwhelmingly liberal.  The news media, too.  Hollywood, ditto.  The Federal Government outside the military is a land of political, social, sexual, and racial favoritism for the constituents of Obama’s electoral base.

Which brings us to the absolute inevitability of the case of Master Sergeant Nathan Sommers, United States Army.

“It seems like with the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell – that the Christians have been the ones who’ve had to go underground and in the closet – for fear of retaliation and reprisals,” Sommers told Fox News. “Christians feel like they can’t be forthright with their faith. They have to hide.”

Ret. Navy Commander John Bennett Wells is representing the master sergeant. He said there is no doubt in his mind that the U.S. military is discriminating against Christians – and specifically his client.

“There’s no question about it,“ Wells told Fox News. “Because he is religious, because he feels that homosexual conduct is wrong for religious reasons, he is basically being persecuted.”

What books he reads, non-obscene bumper stickers on privately-owned vehicles, these have been issues in which guidance is clear, but the Army seems determined to highly discourage his freedom to believe and legally express those beliefs.

The types of stickers on your car were creating an atmosphere detrimental to morale and were creating unnecessary workplace tension,” the officer wrote in an Army document obtained by Fox News.

Really?

“He’s allowed to have those bumper stickers on his car,” he said. “The DoD regulation allows it. There was nothing obscene about it.”

I am betting that Said Named Officer will not be counseled for his poor judgment and lack of professional knowledge regarding the issue surrounding his counseling of a senior SNCO.   Doubtless because that Officer was following his instructions to pressure Master Sergeant Sommers, despite the fact that what Sommers was doing was perfectly legal.   Here, in a nutshell, is the first milepost from Mullen’s unprofessional and unconscionable actions, and his “vote with your feet” line:

“Ironically, the liberals are preaching tolerance,” he said. “They are saying, ‘We can tolerate you.’ But if you have a certain belief that doesn’t align with what the military wants you to believe – particularly religious beliefs – you’re no longer welcome in the U.S. military.”

When we are told that repeal of DADT has gone “smoothly” and without issue, we don’t hear about people like Master Sergeant Sommers, or the other incidents that are the fallout from the religious intolerance that has festered in the US Military.

Ron Crews, executive director of the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty said stories like this are becoming commonplace in the military post-repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

“These stories are the ones that have not been told – about some of the more subtle ramifications of the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy,” he said.

One service member received a severe reprimand for expressing his faith’s religious position about homosexuality in a personal religious blog.

A chaplain was relieved of his command over a military chapel because he could not allow same-sex weddings to take place in the chapel.

And a chaplain who asked senior military officers whether religious liberty would be protected in the wake of the repeal of the law against open homosexual behavior in the military was told to “get in line” or resign.

Crews said they are sharing these stories to let other service members know there is a place to get help. He said Chaplain Alliance publishes a religious liberty palm card – explaining constitutionally protected liberties to service members.

“If you believe your religious liberties have been violated, here’s what you can do,” he said. “We will see that you get the help that you need.”

For its part, the Army issued a statement of its own:

“The Soldier is not, and never has been, “facing retribution and punishment from the military for having anti-Obama bumper stickers on his car, reading books written by conservative authors like Mark Levin and David Limbaugh, and serving Chick-fil-A sandwiches at his promotion party,” the spokesperson added.

Gotcha.  And Benghazi was the result of riots over a video, the IRS didn’t target political opponents, Barack Obama believes in the Second Amendment, Holder knew nothing of Fast and Furious, NSA is not listening to our phone calls, the EPA isn’t squeezing conservative businesses, male-on-male sexual assault reporting hasn’t risen 300% since 2007, Obamacare will reduce premiums, and the Stimulus created 2 million jobs.

Wondering who’s religious liberties have been assiduously observed and protected by the US Military?   Nidal Hassan’s.

5 Comments

Filed under army, Around the web, history, islam, navy, obama, Politics, veterans

“Nobody”

…as in “nobody is listening to your telephone calls”.

Nobody lives here:

ID:1218108 powered by AXP.

And here:

808855

Oh, about US Cyber Command, a headquarters whose mission, ostensibly, is to “…conduct full spectrum military cyberspace operations in order to enable actions in all domains, ensure US/Allied freedom of action in cyberspace and deny the same to our adversaries”….  Who is a co-occupant of their building at Bolling AFB?   Nobody, of course.

nsa-headquarter2-620x401

12 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, Around the web, history, marines, navy, obama, Politics, war

Nasa’s F-8 Digital Fly By Wire Program (part 2)

Part 1 here.

Hardware and Software Development:

Early computers, being the size of rooms and lacking reliability, were considered out of the question for use in a range of applications, not just aviation. The amount of work (calculations) these early computers could do in a relatively short period of time, in the mind of scientists in the late 1940s outweighed the abysmal reliability.

That reliability can be traced to the number of parts in a system. Analog computers had a large number of moving parts therefore not a not very  reliable. Digital computers on the other hand and fewer moving parts and better reliability. That meant a digital computer was an easy early choice in the NASA’s F-8 Program.

By the late 1950s digital computers were small enough (not by today’s standards) to be considered to be installed in aircraft. Most of the output errors in these early digital computers was due to manufacturing defects in vacuum tubes in the logic circuits.  In 1952, John Van Nuemann, suggested that all systems fail at some point and the solution was to use triplicate logic circuits to “vote” on what was valid output.  This solution really wasn’t practicable for aviation until a few years later when transistors started to replace vacuum tubes in digital computers.

Voyager

The Voyager 1 Spacecraft

In the 1960s a group of General Electric engineers stumbled across Van Nuemann lectures on redundancy, as it was to be called, and did some projections that showed that identical software feeding outputs from individual computers to majority logic voters made failures 300 times less likely in 100 hours of operations. As a matter of fact the longest lived spacecraft, Voyager 1, features a 3 digital computer redundant system…and it’s STILL working! The Saturn V booster also used a similar “triple-redundant” computer . At the that time continued shrinkage of the computer hardware meant that processor units could be made redundant.

a13_C69PC442

The Saturn V booster rocket.

All this paid dividends in the Apollo and F-8 programs. Draper Laboratory won the contract to develop the guidance and navigation computers. During hardware development, Draper Lab implemented very strict quality controls (QA, quality assurance) of manufacture. In fact so much so, that “every piece of metal could be traced to the mine it came from.” The strict QA paid off as there were 16 computer and 36 display and keyboard system failures in the 42 computers and 64 DSKYs (Display and Keyboard Unit) built – all on the ground. Along with zero in-flight failures in 1,400 hours of operation, Draper Lab was able to achieve a 99.9% reliability (over the target reliability rate for Apollo of 99.8%).

EC96-43408-1

The DSKY

Software QA and validation became a major cost driver in the Apollo program and by 1967 NASA approached Bellcomm, Inc to study successful software development and management techniques. These processes formed a baseline for QA and development standards for the software industry, years in to the future.

In the F-8 program, Nasa’s Dryden Flight Research Center would be responsible for overall vehicle integration.  Draper Labs remained responsible for requirements analysis, software and interface design, simulator support and flight-test support.

No one had built an all digital flight control system before and Draper Labs ran into 2 issues initially. 1) the use of a digital system in an “all-analog” world and 2) how to ingrate the computer system in to an analog airplane. At the input end of the computer there was an analog-to-digital converter; at the output end a digital to analog to converter. When the pilot moved the stick, displacement translated to voltage. In the pitch axis for instance, the physical limit movement of the stick was 5.9 inches nose up and 4.35 inches nose down. The transformers were designed to generate a signal of plus or minus 3 volts. Therefore input to the analog-to-digital converter was scaled to the longer aft movement, so the forward movement had a maximum value of about 2.4 volts, while the aft movement topped out at –3.0 volts. The voltage from the transformers would be converted into bits and ten be used as input to the software control laws.

Control devices in each axis have a deadband region in which small movements of the stick have no result. In a mechanical, systems the deadband is caused by stretching of the control cables from age and use. This deadband can vary over the lifetime of the cables and the aircraft and each axis has a unique deadband region. In a FBW system, small discrepancies are magnified. If the FBW designers ignored the deadband, the control surfaces would move with every tiny motion of the stick and rudder pedals. The airplane would become too sensitive to fly without the occurrence of pilot induced oscillations (PIOs) that result from constant attempts to dampen motion. Deadband had to dealt with via good old fashioned trial and error.

On the output end, signals causing gearing gains had to be calibrated. Gearing was non-linear because movement of a control device was translated by control laws into movement of the appropriate control surface. This was done by adjusting a linear variable differential transformer to provide a corresponding response.

6-6-2013 7-06-45 PM

The digital flight control system for Phase 1 tests of NASA’s F-8 Crusader

Both deadband and gearing equations were at the center of control law development. The output to the actuators was a sum of the trim command from the electric trim button on the stick and the product of the stick gearing gain and stick deflection.

Through sampling techniques done every 30 milliseconds by the computer, control calculations would occur every 8 to 15 milliseconds.

Control law equations were written into specifications arranged by axis and functional groupings with no attention being paid to how they where used by the flight-control computer. This made the equations more difficult to manipulate and use. Here’s an example from Tomayko:

DEC1=(KGE1)DEP1+DET1

“DE meant “delta” or “change,” C is “command,” K is “constant,” GE is “gearing,” P is “pilot” and T is “trim.” The equation can be loosely translated as: “The command change equals the gearing gain times the pilot stick position plus the change in trim.”

Names for each variable were different for each axis of flight.

Changes to the software specification took place up to March 1973 when the final version of the flight-control software was published. In that time there were many which were managed by a 4-layer system. The lowest impact were “Assembly Control Board” requests. There were straight forward code changes that could be approved by the software manager at Draper. The next highest was an Anomaly – an error that needed to be repaired. Both DFRC and Draper signed off on it.  Next was a Draper designed Program Change Notice  – during development something that could not be implemented in the desired way, so the implementation had to be changed. Both managers signed off on this. The highest level was a “Program Change Request” – a chance to the specification. Both software and project managers had to sign off on this, as there was schedule and budget impacts.

220px-Agc_rope

Rope memory from the Apollo Guidance Computer

The name for the flight control software was “DIGFLY” which was pronounced “digifly” and was written in FORTRAN. There were 2 copies of DIGFLY in the computer memory core rope (here’s a video on how it’s actually done). DIGFLY itself was divided into system and application components. The system software provided task management, a restart segment, service routines to monitor the IMU and provide self test modes. The application software contained flight control and some miscellaneous components. 60% of the F-8 software was taken from the Apollo program.

220px-Apollo_guidiance_computer_ferrit_core_memory

Core rope memory test sample from the Apollo Program.

Converting the F-8 to DFW:

The F-8 Crusader was selected because there were quite a few airframes being retired and the F-8 itself had the internal space available for the necessary equipment. NASA received 4 airframes. F-8A Crusader Bureau Number (BuNo) 145385 was going to the be non-flying FBW test bed, the so-called “Iron Bird” and was given NASA tail number 816.  F-8C BuNo 145546 (interestingly, the first C model to be built) was to the actual flying test bed aircraft. 546 was allocated NASA tail number 802.

NASA 816

F-8A Crusader NASA tail number 816 after the program.

nasa 802

F-8C 145546 (NASA tail number 802) photographed at the Naval Air Test Center in 1959.

Converting the F-8 to accommodate the DFBW hardware and software turned out to the rather straightforward, albeit with a lot work. Problems ranged from canopy that would fit to a sweatshirt found in 802’s fuel tank. It took a year to convert 802 but the interesting thing was that the aircraft retained its fighter-looks and for the most part, it’s performance.

6-6-2013 7-37-49 PM

A port side view of the Apollo hardware as installed in 802.

Cooling problems were the first hurdles and persisted until almost first flight. After all the testing to resolve the cool issue, which even included a redesign of the heat exchangers, it was found that someone forgot to turn on the external cart to cool the computer during engine run-up. DOH!

Cool

The Apollo guidance computer and inertial system (left) on a pallet with the cooling tank and associated piping on the right.

The core ropes containing the flight control software arrived from Raytheon in January 1972 and the second version of the software, DIGFLY 2 was undergoing test and development work by Draper Labs. DIGIFLY 2 would use what remained of Skylab’s core rope which turned out to be the last ropes made for an Apollo computer.

Control sticks were initially tested that were originally tested for the Lunar Module were used in the iron-bird and a DSKY (installed the F-8s left gun bay) from the Apollo 15 Command Module was used to replace one that had been previously blown out due to errors in power requirements.

The F-8 initially retained an analog backup flight control system as well as it’s stock APC (approach power compensator, an autopilot for the throttle).

In flight once the pilot positioned the stick and rudder pedals a completely electric system took over. The inertial measurement unit was an arrangement of accelerometers and gyros that could track altitude, velocity and position changes without depending on external devices to get data. This reference was compared to the pilot’s control inputs were expressed as voltage from transformers to the control stick and rudder pedals, these were called Linear Variable Differential Transformers (LVDTs). There were 2 installed installed at the base of the stick for each control axis, pitch, roll and yaw. Each one served the primary flight control system and the other the analog backup system.

Actuator

Actuators in had 2 systems, a primary and analog backup. In primary mode the digital computer sent analog position signals for a single actuation cylinder. This cylinder was controlled by dual self monitoring servovalves. One valve controlled the servo and the other was there for comparison. If position values differed from each servovalve then the backup mode, 3 servocylinders in a 3 channel arrangement, would engage and control the flight surface.

There was an attempt to upgrade the power plant of 802 from the J57-P20A to a more powerful –p420 but there wasn’t time and the installed –P20 was sent to the Navy for refurbishment by the October 1971. By February 1972, the software and hardware had been thoroughly tested and installed in 802. The engine, pilot’s seat and tail were reinstalled in April.

It was time to fly :)

2 Comments

Filed under history, planes, space

Welcome to the United States of Oceania

PRISM slide crop

Phone calls, e-mail, social media, even your private “cloud computing”.  All under the watchful eye of your benevolent and non-partisan government.  Unless you don’t like big government.  Or higher taxes.  Or gun control.  Or Obamacare.  Or the Benghazi coverup.  Or Fast and Furious.  Or amnesty for illegals.  Or “stimulus” packages.  Or….

You get the idea.  One has to imagine not a little coercion on the part of the US Government to assure cooperation of the participants.

1984-movie-big-brother obama

I will have to see if DARPA has put out a BAA for development of a telescreen.

What was it that President Obama told OSU grads last month?

Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems. Some of these same voices also do their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices. Because what they suggest is that our brave, and creative, and unique experiment in self-rule is somehow just a sham with which we can’t be trusted.

The experiment is most decidedly not a sham.  But Obama and his ilk likewise most decidedly cannot be trusted.   Tyranny lurking just around the corner, indeed.   One has to wonder if Obama heard those voices because of an NSA network intrusion or wiretap.

Remember, folks, this is the Administration that tells us to trust them with the ‘star chamber’ secretive decisions of which American citizens our own government targets for death without trial or charge, and why.   And the Administration that wants to disarm Americans, denying them the last redress against the tyranny of government.

What say we, my fellow thoughtcriminals?   If you prefer not to answer because it will end up on an NSA display screen, I understand.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Precedent.  It is a damned dangerous thing.  I was never crazy about PATRIOT, in large measure because it gave authorities to government which made that government far more dangerous to our existence as a free people than any terrorist or terrorists that authority was allegedly to protect against.

8 Comments

Filed under Around the web, guns, history, islam, obama, Personal, Politics, Uncategorized, war

Hockey vs Soccer, and What’s Wrong with America

I will admit that I was never much of a hockey player.   In fact, I haven’t skated since badly breaking an ankle in High School (playing basketball).   However, I have always thought that hockey players deserve a special place in tough-guy sports lore.

In last night’s Bruins game, a two-overtime 2-1 win for Boston, Center Gregory Campbell went to the ice to block a wicked haaaahhhd slap shot from Evgeny Malkin.  The puck struck him in the side of the right shin, breaking Campbell’s leg.  However, at the time the Bruins were a man down, with about 1:20 to go on the penalty, and Campbell struggled to his feet and continued to help as best he could, broken leg and all, for more than a minute of penalty killing.  Hockey is a damned fine American sport.  (Okay, so it’s Canadian, but let’s not quibble.)

So here’s my theory.  The rise in popularity of soccer in this country is directly proportional to the decline in masculinity of the American male.  What makes me say that? Besides the fact that soccer is the sport of socialists and commies?   Let’s have a look at how soccer players react to injuries.  None of what you will see below is a broken anything….  (though I think my favorite is the goalie at 1:24 who obviously has been shot, or perhaps the two at 1:44 who suffer simultaneous disfiguring injuries):

Need further proof?  You skeptics.  Let’s do a side by side.  David Beckham compared to Bobby Hull (w, and w/o T).

david-beckham-picture-5M~ SUN0109 Hull

How about on the field of play?

david-beckham-picture-4p-82319-bobby-hull-chicago-blackhawks-bloody-16x20-photo-cotg-16nhl-bhull01

A candid, perhaps?

1358981490_13-david-beckham-1500Bobby Hull 3

My money’s on the Jet, my friends.   He is in his mid-70s now, and could still lump some skulls.

Too many American boys are idolizing people like this Beckham guy.   Delicate sorts who are celebrities rather than players.  Not enough are willing to lose a few teeth, or skate on a broken leg, to WIN.   Because we are all winners for trying, after all!

Hey!  You sissy kids!  Get off my lawn with that damned soccer ball!  Don’t any of you own a REAL football?

20 Comments

Filed under Around the web, history, Humor, Personal, Uncategorized

Leadership and Responsibility on the Longest Day

failure-message

Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air and the Navy did all that Bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone.

The troops did not fail.  More than 140,000 Allied soldiers came ashore at Normandy, on this day 69 years ago.   The Second Front so long in the coming was established.  The cost was more than ten thousand casualties, of which approximately 4,000 were killed.  The same number that died in Iraq in eight years, died on the French coast in a single morning.   Tens of thousands more would die before Nazi Germany surrendered unconditionally eleven months and one day later.

General Dwight Eisenhower’s famous note hearkens to a brand of leadership seemingly all but extinct today.   People in positions of great responsibility shouldering the burden for their decisions and everything that is done or fails to be done by those in their charge.    What difference does it make?   The difference between victory and defeat, liberty and subjugation, existence and extinction.

5 Comments

Filed under Air Force, armor, army, Artillery, ducks, guns, history, infantry, Lybia, marines, navy, planes, SIR!, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Samantha Power to the UN?

Our (erstwhile?) Israeli allies have to be thrilled with this.  Drudge has a link to Power’s 2002 remarks (see above) regarding US “intervention” with Israel, presumably to halt what Power terms time and again in her remarks as “genocide”.

Then, as Drudge also links, there are the 2008 campaign remarks about former SecState Hillary Clinton.

“She is a monster, too – that is off the record – she is stooping to anything,” Ms Power said, hastily trying to withdraw her remark.

Ms Power said of the Clinton campaign: “Here, it looks like desperation. I hope it looks like desperation there, too.

“You just look at her and think, ‘Ergh’. But if you are poor and she is telling you some story about how Obama is going to take your job away, maybe it will be more effective. The amount of deceit she has put forward is really unattractive.”

Power, married to Administration official and Socialist laywer Cass Sunstein, is yet another ill-qualified, America-hating, far-left activist whose version of reality will be sure to cause problems.   She was a journalist, covering the Balkans in the 1990s, and her point of view is largely shaped by the micro and not the macro issues of statesmanship and international affairs.   While Power has campaigned for US-led military intervention to prevent genocide, apparently the killing of nearly a million Iraqis by Saddam Hussein’s Nazi-inspired regime does not  qualify, as she opposed the Iraq war.    Nor, can I recall hearing in her “religious freedom” exhortations, a public peep about the massacre of Christians across the Middle East and Africa since the 2008 election of Barack Obama.

However, the appointment of “humanitarian” interventionist Samantha Powers, coupled with the Obama Administration’s assertion that international permission rather than that of Congress is the ticket to use of military force, creates potential for yet another interesting showdown between Obama and Congress regarding that pesky old Constitution.   It also proves decisively that the Obama Administration has learned nary a thing from its consistent and disastrous appointment of ill-suited, inexperienced ideologues charged with execution of any kind of coherent foreign policy for America.

Cue the calliope music.

5 Comments

Filed under gaza, girls, history, islam, israel, Lybia, obama, Politics, stupid, Uncategorized, war

New National Security Adviser is Susan Rice

437647596

Waaaay back in 2009, when Barack Obama was first elected President, he appointed my old Division Commander, General James Jones, USMC (Ret.) to the post of National Security Adviser.    Within a group perceived largely as ideological rather than practical thinkers, a group sorely lacking in foreign policy experience, Jones was considered “adult supervision”.

Jones lasted fewer than 24 months, and his dislike of the Obama team, Axelrod, Emanuel, and his Deputy NSA Tom Donilon was well known.   Donilon was perceived almost universally by uniformed leadership as an amateur incompetent, a political animal in way over his head in matters of national security.   Jones’ opinion of Donilon was similarly low,  and the Administration’s dismissiveness of Jones’ views and embracing of Donilon’s led Jones to the door well short of the two years promised when he was appointed.

Indeed, US foreign policy during Donilon’s tenure has been a catastrophe.   US reaction to the “Arab Spring”, to a resurgent Russia, the precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, the Benghazi fiasco, and DPRK sabre-rattling, can only be described as befuddled and reactive.   Our “Pacific Pivot” has thus far been purely symbolic, as Chinese influence and power continues to grow while America’s recedes.  The National Security Council has been adrift, knocked loose of its “smart power” and “reset button” ideological pinnings by a head-on collision with power politics by expert practitioners of the craft.   To make matters worse, Donilon is strongly suspected of leaking classified information, the very kind which endangers US servicemen and women and diplomatic personnel, for the Administration’s political gain.

So now, after thirty months, Donilon is out as National Security Adviser.   His replacement is UN Ambassador Susan Rice.   Rice’s resumė includes time on the periphery of national security affairs, but little by way of actual decision-making and meaningful policy formulation.  And where she has, as Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, her decisions have been highly questionable.  Such was the case with the Sudan during the Clinton Administration, when the US had an opportunity to glean intelligence on Osama bin Laden, but Rice declined to do so.

Rice’s visible dislike of the late Richard Holbrooke, the veteran diplomat whose foreign service began before Rice was born, typifies the arrogance and hubris so often found in those in key posts of the Obama Administration.  For Holbrooke’s part, his opinion of Susan Rice was that she was incompetent lightweight who refused counsel from an experienced hand.   Rice was considered for the National Security Adviser position in 2009, but that went to Jones.  Rice was made Ambassador to the United Nations.  She was mentioned again recently to replace Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, but John Kerry was selected instead.

Now, Rice is to be NSA after all.   Her less than impressive track record before 2012 has now been immeasurably darkened by her demonstrated lack of integrity.  Quite simply, Susan Rice knowingly lied to the American people regarding the self-inflicted diplomatic calamity that was the Benghazi incident and the murder of a US Ambassador and three other Americans.   Rice went before the television cameras many days after learning the truth about the nature and target of the terrorist attack against the US Benghazi Consulate, and perpetuated the falsehood that the attack was the result of a spontaneous demonstration against a youtube video turned violent.   Susan Rice lacks both integrity and judgment.  Not at all a combination to inspire confidence.  The most that can be said for her replacing Donilon as National Security Adviser is that the move may be a step sideways for a scandal-ridden Administration whose foreign policy team has shown itself naive, inexperienced, and amateurish in the extreme.

The round of musical chairs being played by the Obama Administration offers little real promise to improve the effectiveness of US foreign affairs since 2009.  Recycling the same tainted and ill-qualified ideologues who not only do not understand power politics, but seemingly refuse to recognize that such a concept even exists, will further erode America’s ability to defend its interests and influence both our enemies and our allies.   This is not a student union protest.  This Administration needs to grow up.  It takes an adult to deal with the Putins of the world.   Susan Rice, as National Security Adviser, hardly qualifies.

6 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, girls, history, Iran, iraq, islam, Lybia, obama, Politics, Uncategorized, war

DAMMIT!

abe_simpson

Dammit, dammit, dammit!

NO!  I am not eligible for the senior citizen discount!

I know she was only trying to be helpful.

But still.  I have eleven years to go, for goodness sake.

Now I wanna watch Matlock!

6 Comments

Filed under history, Humor, Personal, stupid

The Battle of Midway- First Moves

Traditionally, the Battle of Midway is listed as occurring over 4/5 June, 1942. But a proper appreciation of the battle also has to take into account the actions of 3 June 1942.

SteelJawScribe a few years ago wrote a fantastic thumbnail history of the battle, and rather than recount in my own feeble way, I’ll link to him.

One of the amazing things about looking back at Midway is just how decisive it was (though that would take a long time to be fully apparent) and frankly, just how small it was.  While virtually the entire Japanese fleet was tasked for the operation, in effect, only the four carriers were engaged. And virtually the entirety of available US Navy assets were deployed, a total of three carriers with cruiser and destroyer escort. In three short years, a three carrier force would be the hallmark of a decidedly subsidiary operation, not the entirety of the Navy.

3 Comments

Filed under history

OV-10 Bronco In Perspective

Found this vid out on the interwebs tonight. It has some of the best Bronco footage I’ve ever seen. Flight, weapons and development test, combat in Vietnam (including VAL-4 “Black Ponies”), a subsystems overview and a performance and specification summary.

Some of the best-est Bronco footage I’ve ever seen.

You’re welcome xbradtc :)

Comments Off

Filed under Air Force, history, marines, navy, planes, war

NASA’s F-8 Digital Fly By Wire Program (part 1)

A quick history of flight control systems:

Wright-brothers-first-flight
December 17 1903, the Wright brothers make the first powered, sustained flight at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Cables and pulleys were the flight control system of the day.

A system of pulleys and cables enabled the Wright Brothers were the first to take to the air in controllable flight on 17 December 1903. Aircraft of World War 1 methods to control aircraft remained basically the same cable and pulley system. Pilot control inputs through stick and rudder pedals were transmitted to the control surfaces via pulleys and cables.

Fokker DR1
Fokker DR1. Representative for a typical World War 1 aircraft.

By the time World War 2 started aircraft were more complex, faster and far more capable. Most flight control systems at the time remained cables and pulleys but the problem of stability remained. There needed to be a method for reducing the constant need for pilot control input especially during long flights.

b29
Boeing’s B-29 Superfortress. Typical configuration for a World War 2 aircraft.

By the late 1940s a very primitive “assisted flight control system” had flown from Newfoundland to England aboard a C-54 entirely under the control of a flight program punched out on cards.

c54-03
Douglas C-54 Skymaster

Wartime technological leaps enabled postwar aircraft designs not only increase in speed but also increase in size. At 1000 knots there simply isn’t enough time for a human being to react. The larger size of aircraft also meant there was a great deal more inertia for a human to struggle to control. Due to the increase in aircraft size, inertia and dynamic pressure, without some from of mechanical assistance flying would become too difficult for pilots to handle because of the force amount of force required to move to control surface. The solution was to connect the pilot’s stick and rudder pedals to hydraulics which were, in turn, connected to surfaces with which to control the aircraft.

Development of hydraulic flight control systems meant there was no direct connection between the stick/rudder pedals and the control surface. Pilots develop a sense of what an aircraft is doing, not only from visual cues, but also from seat of the pants flying to understand orientation of the airplane.  Hydraulic systems brought about the need for “artificial feel systems” that replicated force feedback to the pilot through the stick and from the control surface.

Hydraulic flight controls are heavier than pulleys and cables, adding weight to the aircraft. That translates into less weight overall an aircraft can use for a given task. Less weight devoted to fuel for range in a fighter, less weight devoted to cargo or passengers in the airlines. In spaceflight weight is also a critical issue. The more a spacecraft weighs, the more thrust is required to bring that space to orbit. Controlling a spacecraft with hydraulics to going to be too heavy.

NASA used a simple binary logic flight control program in the Mercury program. The logical design consisted of a control signal that transmitted “on/off” commands for firing of the maneuvering rockets. The attitude of the spacecraft could be changed by the pilot’s moving a hand controller with the direction of the controller’s movement indicating pitch, roll or yaw to the control system. The control system then sent appropriate signals to fire the correct sets of rockets to achieve the desired effect. The Mercury flight control system was only capable of attitude control.

mercury_capsule
The Mercury capsule as displayed at the Udvar-Hazy Center of the National Air and Space Museum.

By 1968 all the NASA was focused on putting a human on the moon. Grumman, designer of the Lunar Module, was tasked with NASA and MIT to develop a flight control system capable of landing on the moon. The flight control system for the Lunar Module was called PGNCS  (Primary Guidance, Navigation and Control System pronounced “pings”). Considerable experience in developing PGNCS was gained by engineers that worked on the Polaris SLBM and Atlas ICBM programs.

Apollo_lunar_module
The Grumman Lunar Module on display at the National Air and Space Museum.

PGNCS had all the elements that were going to be needed to develop a flight control system. The most important element was the inertial measurement unit. The Lunar Module used 3 IMUs (inertial measurement units), 1 each for each axis of flight (pitch, roll and yaw). The IMU generated analog signals that had to be read by one of the first digital computers.

lm_imu
Schematic cutaway of the IMU in the Lunar Module.

This video details the development of the IMU and integration with the Lunar Module’s flight control system (it’s a fascinating 3-part series).

LLRV-engine-testing-on-ramp-1964
The LLRV

The LLRV (Lunar Landing Research Vehicle) was developed to test flight control laws (programming code) for the Lunar Module here on Earth. The LLRV used reaction control jets because the Moon has 1\6th of the Earth’s gravity. The LLRV was not an aerodynamic vehicle as it used solely engine thrust to get airborne.  Once flight control laws were developed, testing of the LLRV wound down but a group led by NASA thought that software developed and tested on the LLRV and the Apollo Lunar Lander might be beneficial to aircraft control. After LLRV, computers, sensors and actuators became advanced enough to start flight-testing.

Computers in flight control systems come into 2 distinct types. Analog and digital. Mechanical analog computers operate by creating a mechanical analogy between the position of numbers on various scales and the products, quotients, squares, cube roots, etc that it’s used to calculate. In terms of flight control computers, control laws are hard-wired via the circuitry in the computer. While analog computer is resistant to power surges and viruses it’s very difficult to re-program. That requires a physical reconfiguration of the embedded circuits. Analog computers also run at higher temperatures because data is in the form of amplitudes and temperature effects modulate the amplitude.

v-2-rocket-1

The first vehicular use of an analog computer was with the German A-4 [V-2] rocket of World War 2 fame. The A-4 used an electronic analog computer that modeled the differential equations of the control laws and accepted voltage values and input and generated voltage as output to an amplifier. The amplifier then sent those commands to the control surface actuators. This technology formed the basis for digital computers almost 40 years later.

Digital computers on the other hand read data in binary, “1”s and “0”s. Data needs to be converted to binary string of bits before it can be used by the computer. The problem is these bit streams, coming from multiple sources, can be too dense and rapid for proper computer processing into readable data sets. After 1963 improvements in transistors and work on “sampling theory” made the use of digital computers more widespread not only in aviation but a whole range of applications.

t-33
NT-33 In-Flight Simulator

In 1954, the NT-33 In-flight Simulator was developed to test other equipment that would be needed in a digital flight control system. The NT-33 tested improvements in gyroscopes, actuators, effectors, stability augmentation and pitot-static systems. Also in 1957 the USAF flew a modified B-47 (53-2280) with fly-by-wire channel in the pitch axis.

B-47E-111-BW Stratojet 53-2280 (JB-47E) 2
JB-74E 53-2280 Fly By Wire test-bed aircraft.

By early 1971 the NASA Office of Advanced Research and Technology wanted to see more technology transferred from the Apollo program. Luckily for them the flight control computer was, up that time, one of the most reliable computers ever built. Soon the office approved for a feasibility study to install Apollo flight control system hardware into an F-8 Crusader.

F-8C_Crusader_VF-91_in_flight_c9162
A stock Vought F-8C Crusader BuNo 146993 from VF-191 “Red Lightnings.”

The F-8 Crusader is a single seat, single engine, carrier borne fighter from the 1950s. The ‘sader, as it’s properly known, gained a fearsome reputation as a MiG killer in the skies over North Vietnam however by the 1970s the ‘sader was being phased out in-favor of the newer F-4 Phantom II. NASA chose the ‘sader because it was readily available and cost effective. The intention was to modify the ‘sader by removing the horizontal stabilizers and placing them in front of the wings (as canards). The F-8s centerline air inlet  would have been unaffected by this modification. However this was considered too costly to be included in the program.

By 1970 NASA acquired 4 F-8Cs on their way to the boneyard and sent them to the Dryden Flight Research Center. Money for NASA’s Digital Fly By Wire was appropriated $1 million dollars for the first year. Over time the entire cost of the program, which ran just over 10 years, would run $12 million dollars. The program itself would be conducted in 3 phases starting in early 1971. Phase I, scheduled to start in 1971, would have 2 goals: ensuring the technology worked and developing the tools to move forward. Phase IB would introduce a second computer in the flight control system and begin to test and develop system redundancy. Phase II, scheduled to run Q2 of 1974, was to concentrate on gaining knowledge and developing techniques for increasing computer reliability. Over time the schedule wasn’t met but the objective for each phase never changed. Over the next year Flight Research Center hardware and software engineers began modification work on the F-8 aircraft.

nasa802
Vought F-8C NASA 802 Digital Fly By Wire Test-bed aircraft.

The next segments will cover modification of the F-8 aircraft, phases of the flight test program and benefits to future aircraft programs.

4 Comments

Filed under Air Force, history, navy, planes, space

Exploring the Jutland Wrecks

A very good documentary on a diving expedition to try and explain the loss of battle cruisers Invincible, Indefatigable, Queen Mary, and armored cruiser Defence at Jutland on 31 May 1916.   There has been much written about the fragility of Jackie Fisher’s battle cruisers, his fast “cats”, where at Jutland the Royal Navy suffered devastating explosions from relatively little damage, while their High Seas Fleet counterparts absorbed frightful punishment but still managed to limp home to the Jade.

A myth surrounding the loss of these vessels was that German shells slammed into the ammunition magazines, piercing the too-thin armored plate and detonating massive explosions in each which blew the large ships apart.   Far less publicized is the reputation of the Royal Navy and her sailors for flagrant disregard for safety in the handling of cordite propellant.   Cordite in open spaces, the failure to close flash doors between handling rooms and turrets, possibly in order to increase rates of fire of the main batteries, were common practices.  A good summation of the highly dangerous practices, and the foolhardy risks such practices entailed, is provided beginning around 36:00.

As an artilleryman, I have been responsible for burning powder countless times.  The flames from a football-sized powder bag will often burn three or four meters high, and produce intense heat.  (See video.)  And those bags are miniscule compared to the propellant charges of a medium or large naval gun.   Once exposed propellant had been ignited belowdecks on those vessels, there was nothing to stop it, nor any way for sailors to get away from it.

Twenty-five years after Jutland, almost to the day, the Royal Navy’s greatest warship, 42,000-ton battle cruiser HMS Hood, exploded and sank after a strike from Bismarck’s 15″ guns.  Like her sisters a generation earlier, she did not succumb to the detonation of a projectile magazine, but with the roaring furnace of propellant spelling her doom.

Worth the viewing.  And thinking about the importance of battle drills.  And the integrity of senior Officers.

5 Comments

Filed under armor, guns, history, navy, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Fox News Shamelessly Steals From URR


http://video.foxnews.com/v/2419248967001/are-we-already-in-a-cyber-war-with-china/?intcmp=HPBucket&playlist_id=929831913001

Why don’t they just admit they read my stuff?  The least they could do is let me have lunch with Dana Perino or Molly Line….

URR from 40 months ago:

chinese-cyber-attack

War which has undergone the changes of modern technology and the market system will be launched even more in atypical forms. In other words, while we are seeing a relative reduction in military violence, at the same time we definitely are seeing an increase in political, economic, and technological violence. However, regardless of the form the violence takes, war is war, and a change in the external appearance does not keep any war from abiding by the principles of war.

The above quote is from the book “Unrestricted Warfare“, written by a pair of People’s Liberation Army Colonels, Qaio Liang and Wang Xiangsui, and published in Beijing in early 1999.The book has gotten some attention, but often in the eleven years since it was unveiled to the West, the work has largely been dismissed as unlikely wishful thinking on the part of the two authors, and not representative of PLA viewpoints or policy.  As recently as early 2008, discussion in strategic-level war games was dismissive of Chinese capability and intent in the cyber realm.

equipmentcybw

Well, today the Times of London published yet another ominous summary of China’s ongoing activities in the cyber realm.   One should be reminded that this represents only what is being acknowledged publicly.   Of particular note are the words of Dr. James Lewis of CSIS:

Dr Lewis said that neither the US nor any of its Western allies had formed an effective response to the Chinese threat, which has its origins in a massive boost to Chinese technology ordered by Deng Xiaoping, the late Chinese leader, in 1986. The West’s own cyber offensives have so far been directed largely at terrorists rather than nation states, giving China virtually free rein to penetrate Western systems with its own world-class hackers and increasingly popular Chinese-made components. “You almost have to admire them,” Dr Lewis said. “They have been very consistent in their goals.”

Will we look back across an economic or military cataclysm years or decades on and acknowledge, regretfully, that the warnings had been in front of us since 1999, or even 1986?

Comments Off

Filed under Around the web, history, Humor, Personal, stolen valor, Uncategorized, war

Reuters: US Weapons Systems Compromised by Chinese Intrusions

Chinese-Hackers

Designs for more than two dozen major U.S. weapons systems have been compromised by Chinese hackers, a U.S. report said on Monday, as a news report in Australia said Chinese hackers had stolen the blueprints for Australia’s new spy headquarters.

Citing a report prepared for the Defence Department by the Defence Science Board, the Washington Post reported that compromised U.S. designs included combat aircraft and ships, as well as missile defences vital for Europe, Asia and the Gulf.

Read the whole predictable, worrisome tale.

The Defense Department has long ago missed the boat on China and PLA development efforts to penetrate the communications/information systems of the US and her allies.   While there are some in the senior field grade and GOFO ranks who do “get it”, and comprehend the portent of the PRC’s course of action over the last dozen years, most clearly do not.  This is reflected in the questionable conceptual assertion that “cyber” is somehow a “domain” of warfare akin to that of land, sea, and air.  And that the US will somehow have “information dominance” over our foes.  This, despite the fact that the US Navy in particular cannot provide a meaningful definition of the term.  Indeed, the word “cyber” is a nebulous and ill-suited word under which DoD lumps together digital communications, information storage and integration, and processing algorithms critical to the function of a modern military, a modern economy, and a modern society.  

As recently as 2010, I was treated to a senior policy maker’s foolishly optimistic opinion that there was no real proof that the People’s Republic of China had embarked upon the unrestricted warfare that had been outlined more than ten years before.   He airily dismissed the document in question as little more than the musings of two PLA officers which did not represent any official PRC/PLA policy.   This, despite the massive and mounting evidence even then of Chinese efforts to penetrate US military and civilian networks, and despite the fact that many of the exploits which resulted in the Reuters article had been in place a number of years before his rather curious assertions.

Another unequivocal indication of the Defense Department’s inability to grasp the import of China’s building capabilities has been how “cyber” is incorporated into scenarios of the various war games held by the service components and combatant commands.  We have yet to break from the long-standing paradigm of action-reaction-counteraction which defines military operations against a hostile adversary, rather than a realistic scripting of what the effects of pre-conflict exploits would be to operating forces.   Our comprehension of the tactics and capabilities of our adversaries, particularly non-state or trans-national actors, and how they use information networks to their advantage and our disadvantage, remains highly suspect.  Time and again, contractors posit highly improbable, even fanciful, near-future capabilities to wow uniformed commanders, despite an almost complete lack of understanding as to how the adversary leverages the “big I” internet and the disruptive technologies available to him.    Attribution, even detection, painstaking processes that often require months or years to accomplish, often are represented as near-real-time capabilities.  Such assertions often go unchallenged by senior leaders who lack the technical savvy or systemic understanding to know better.

Here’s looking for some honest, rigorous consequence management exercises grounded in reality, which yield hard lessons for our operating forces whose two-plus decades of near-complete mastery of the electro-magnetic spectrum may be at an end.   I would love to see meaningful exploration of how we would fight with critical capabilities denied or degraded, and an operational-strategic assessment of alternatives for network function and weapons employment in the face of disruptive actions by an adversary of China’s capabilities.

After all, of the really bad things that can be done to a military force (or anybody else) through exploiting network intrusions, simply shutting off critical systems is well down on the list.

6 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, Around the web, history, marines, navy, Politics, Uncategorized, war