Category Archives: SIR!

That Explains It! Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution

Dwyane 'The Rock' Johnson-20120419-28

The Daily Mail tells us the story.

‘In all three countries, physically strong males consistently pursue the self-interested position on redistribution.’

Men with low upper-body strength, on the other hand, were less likely to support their own self-interest.

No wonder why the men who seem most bent on relying on the protection of the collective instead of being the protector always seem to be milquetoasts.

these-photos-of-joe-biden-getting-intimate-with-a-lady-biker-are-pricelessht_paul_ryan_time5_jef_121011_wblog

 

It is a hell of a lot more plausible than Global Warming.    So get thyself in the gym, move steel, and try not to act like Mary-Ellen Sisterpants.   Bulk up or be crushed.

About these ads

2 Comments

Filed under guns, Humor, marines, Personal, Politics, SIR!, Uncategorized, veterans

All That for a Flag; Navy Officer who Provided Iwo Jima Flag Dies at 90

FLGIMGS1000000398_-00_Marines-Raising-Flag-at-Mount-Suribachi-Image-Downloadable-Image_3

Navy Lieutenant Alan Wood, Communications Officer aboard LST 779, the man who provided the second and larger Iwo Jima flag raised by the patrol of 28th Marines in the war’s most iconic image, has passed away at 90.

20130423__PSN-L-WOODOBIT~p1_300

Semper Fidelis, Lieutenant Wood.   You may report into the growing formation of heroes mustering on the fantail above.

 

 

 

2 Comments

Filed under Around the web, history, marines, navy, SIR!, veterans, war

Winning Words From a Warlord

winston_churchill

In the very darkest days of the Second World War, when England stood alone, and suffered alone, Prime Minister Winston Churchill replaced his friend General Edmund Ironside, veteran of two wars, as Chief of the Imperial General Staff with General Sir John Dill.  Churchill told Dill:

“We cannot afford to confine Army appointments to persons who have excited no hostile comments in their careers…  This is a time to try men of force and vision, and not to be exclusively confined to those who are judged to be thoroughly safe by conventional standards.”

Ponder.

But for the leadership in our Armed Forces to embrace such sentiment.

4 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, history, marines, navy, Politics, SIR!, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Farewell to the Iron Lady: Margaret Thatcher dead at 87

Margaret Thatcher

Britain’s only female Prime Minister, a friend and confidant of President Ronald Reagan and a staunch US ally, has died following a stroke.  She was 87.

Mrs. Thatcher held the office of Prime Minister from 1979 through 1990, and was a Conservative of immense stature at a time when Socialism was on the rise all over Europe and the British Isles.   And she halted, temporarily alas, the decline of Great Britain following the Second World War.   She had the courage to order the retaking of the Falklands, and understood the world of power politics in the depths of the Cold War.  She was also a LADY, albeit an Iron one.

Her warnings against the EURO and the European Central Bank were cogent and prescient.  But for Britain having followed her advice.

When the far-left feminists cite great women to hold political office in the modern age, they will invariably rattle off the names of the lessers, the second-rate and third-rate leaders  (virtually all liberals), including our own, as their heroines.  Almost NEVER is the name Margaret Thatcher mentioned, and when it is, there is either an inevitable qualifier that she was a conservative and therefor NOT a true “woman”, or a downright derogatory reference because she despised socialism and had utter contempt for the Socialists.  Ponder.

French President Francois Mitterand once commented that Mrs. Thatcher had the “eyes of Caligula, and the mouth of Marilyn Monroe”.   Be that as it may, she was a leader and a statesman, someone who stood unabashedly for what she believed in, and defended those beliefs with power and eloquence and unimpeachable reason.   Our current crop of GOP leaders could take a lesson from Maggie.

Rest in Peace, Mrs. Thatcher.  You will be missed.  I sorely wish America had someone like you at the helm.

***********************

A commenter over on the porch provided a most fitting epitaph for the incomparable Mrs. Thatcher, which was spoken of Winston Churchill by Harold MacMillian upon Churchill’s final visit to the House of Commons:

“The man you have just seen leave these chambers is unique in all of British history. The oldest among us cannot remember another of his like, and the youngest among you, however long you may live, will never see his like again.”

So it is true of Margaret Thatcher.

9 Comments

Filed under Around the web, girls, history, obama, Politics, SIR!, Uncategorized, war

Blogs. Why We Write ‘Em, Why We Read ‘Em.

milblogs2a

Those of us in this somewhat focused community of MilBlog writers and readers are often asked by people who haven’t any exposure to MilBlogs, “Why do you do it?  You put in a lot of time and work.  What’s the point?”

It’s a fair question.   Thinking of ideas, and putting together a cogent discussion starter, or historical summary, takes more time than people think.  Knowing that, and being somewhat of an analysis geek (which may turn out to be a very good thing soon), I have my list of half a dozen daily reads, at least.  This’n here.  Salamander’s Front Porch.  Ray’s Information Dissemination.  OP-FOR, The Castle, and a number of other places make the list, blended with traditional news sources domestic and foreign, plus policy and analysis outfits.

Why?  Well, my gracious host here gives me an outlet for expression.  Like anyone with a fair-sized ego, I believe just a little bit that everyone is entitled to my opinion.  But there is also the great opportunity for feedback.  To hear from a mostly very educated crowd, their opinions and takes on events and occurrences domestically and in foreign affairs.  But it extends into culture, literary works, certainly history, and other aspects that spark discussion.

But one of the most valuable reasons to read and write in the Military Blogosphere is to hear from people who are truly experts in their fields, who possess great wisdom, are extensively experienced, and are considered and well-spoken people.  I do miss terribly reading the thoughts and musings of Lex, which was a morning staple and often provided several day-long trains of thought.  And this is true of not just Bloggers, but commenters.  Byron, the ugly old shipfitter, could wax authoritative about steel, and aluminum, and hull flex, and do it in a way that, perhaps over beer, I am sure I could listen intently to for hours.     Grandpa Bluewater’s urbane sophistication and eloquent dissertation always is worth the consideration, whether one agrees or not.    And there are others who add insight and humor, and are enjoyable to read.

Another such commenter is Steeljaw Scribe, shepherd of a superb blog of his own.   I did something the last two days that I rarely do, which is to go back and re-read a comment he made in Salamander’s post of the IG investigation of Admiral Gaouette.  His explanation of the dynamics of the bridge of a CVN, and the personalities and cultures that must blend and not clash if the mission is to be accomplished.

The bridge of a CVN is a unique environment that brings together two communities that normally opt to keep their distances from one another – SWOs and Aviators. That the three senior officers that regularly spend time up there (CO, XO and Navigator) are also aviators can at times, exacerbate that standoffish environment. This clash of cultures evolves from one group that is brought up in a dynamic environment and is used to rapidly changing events, making intuitive decisions and being cognizant that their butt and that of the x-number of NFOs or aircrew with them will suffer the consequences of those decisions. SWOs that typically (and note I said *typically* – there are always exceptions) come to the carrier do not come from the CRUDES environment, but from amphibs and auxiliaries and tend to be methodical if somewhat conservative and deliberative in their decision-making and watchstanding. At least that was my experience as a CVN nav. My challenge was working across that divide – to show the aviators (from watchstanders up to the XO who would go on to his first deep draft after this tour) on the one hand, how a series of events can unfold where little things not readily apparent to the eyeball can bite you (case history of the Eisenhower hitting the Spanish freighter at anchor in Hampton Roads being one of my teaching points). The flip side of that was getting the SWOs to be more anticipatory (e.g., looking to the next 2x cycles for managing sea space for downwind repositioning) as well as coming to grips with the immediacy of fixed wing operations at sea.

I know of no other vehicle by which an audience can learn, and share the insights of men and women with such experience.   It is the gaining of understanding, at the end of the day, that makes all this effort worthwhile.   Brad’s rules here do not include “write only what I agree with” or “water it down so it couldn’t possibly offend”.   He trusts us to understand and abide by propriety, and we seem to, as do the commenters,  on the whole.  And that is appreciated.

So in the end, despite the trolls, and my own alarming tendency to follow links and wind up pissing away two hours looking at cool stuff, reading and writing is worth the effort.   Even if the pay isn’t great.

3 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, Around the web, Artillery, guns, history, infantry, iraq, marines, navy, Personal, SIR!, Uncategorized, veterans

At Long Last, a Supreme Commander

ifochfe001p1

Ninety-five years ago, on 26 March 1918, at a conference in Doullens, the Allies, the French, British, and now the Americans, finally agree to appoint an Allied Supreme Commander for the Western Front.   For three and a half years, neither the British nor the French were willing to countenance placing their forces under command of a General from the other respective nation for any but the most local and temporary situations.   Differences in philosophy, national pride, individual ego, and centuries-old mutual distrust (exacerbated by the very lack of coordination such a situation made inevitable) created an environment where the alliance became, at times, highly contentious and all but hostile.   The result was most often a stunning lack of coordination of effort and vision that played into the hands of the Imperial German commanders, allowing them to defeat in detail discordant Allied offensive efforts that might have otherwise seriously pressed the Germans.

The Great War on the Western Front is a grim and maddening exposition of military incompetence with the most tragic of consequences.   There are myriad reasons for this seemingly endless phantasm which wasted an entire generation.  Elderly, ossified commanders who had neither the energy or mental flexibility to wage modern war.   Weapons technology that rendered a generation of tactics (and tacticians) dangerously obsolete.

To these shortcomings and failures must be added the lack of a single overall commander to coordinate strategy, impart mediation, and provide the vision for fighting the armies of the Western Front.   Unity of Command, one of the nine principles of war,  did not come until very late in the day, and that under extreme and compelling conditions as the German Spring Offensive threatened to break the British 5th Army and capture Paris.

So it would be Ferdinand Foch, erstwhile Chief of Staff for Marshall Petain, who would finally, at long last, command in the West.

3 Comments

Filed under army, Artillery, guns, history, infantry, planes, Politics, SIR!, Uncategorized, veterans, war

General Barry McCaffrey: Lauds “Marines’ Aversion to BS” On Women in Infantry

Soldiers with the US Army's 6-4 Cavalry walk down a mountain path during a patrol near Combat Outpost Keating in eastern Afghanistan

Time Magazine (of all places) carries General McCaffrey’s missive.  Well worth the read (which contains a link to Marine General Newbold’s superb “Seven Myths about ‘Women in Combat’”).

The argument for women at rifle battalion team level is unsound. Makes as much sense as mandating women on all-male professional contact sports teams.

Life in a rifle company is still incredibly brutal, filthy, requires enormous physical energy and upper body strength, and calls for a spirit of personal violence. There is zero personal privacy. Bodily functions take place in close proximity.

Troops are constantly injured from carrying heavy loads and crashing down hills in the dark. They dig like moles to stay alive.

Infantry units live like wild animals during periods of extended combat. Mostly it is a business of self-selected young men.  Most of these combat soldiers end up in these units because they actually want to fight.

One might think there would be some additional recognition of such opinions expressed by long-time practitioners of the craft of ground combat.   But alas.   Objective analysis gives way to activism and some other “isms” all too often.

As General Newbold rightly asserts:

Pity the truthful leader who attempts to hold to standards based on realistic combat factors, and tells truth to power. Most won’t, and the others won’t survive.

(H/T to Battleland)

11 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, army, Artillery, girls, guns, history, infantry, iraq, marines, navy, obama, Politics, recruiting, SIR!, stupid, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Danny and Peachy

man-who-would-be-king-03

Of course, I am referring to Danny Dravot and Peachy Carnehan, the two former Sergeants of Her Majesty’s Fore and Fit, who set out to rule Kafiristan, and in the process become the richest men in the Empire.

Among the treasure trove of goodies from Moe Delaun that I referred to in a previous post was the magnificent epic film The Man Who Would be King, the John Huston-directed adaptation of the Kipling tale.   The spectacular cinematography and beautiful (and authentic!) Edith Head costumes add to a brilliant performance by Michael Caine (Peachy) and Sean Connery (Danny), and an equally brilliant portrayal of Kipling himself by Christopher Plummer.   Saeed Jaffrey plays a long-lost Gurkha trooper, the lone survivor of a survey expedition killed in an avalanche some years before.

The Man Who Would be King was the first offering last evening in the new DVD player.   I last saw this movie some 35 years ago on network television, when, as a callow youth I knew Kipling only for Just So Stories, and The Jungle Book, and Rikki Tikki Tavi. But the film stayed with me, and very much was a factor in my adult appreciation of the brilliant work of that man.  And last evening, I enjoyed the movie immensely, once again.

While very much faithful to the original Kipling short story, The Man Who Would Be King has a few minor changes from the written tale.   All in all, though, I imagine Brother Kipling would be most pleased at the results of Huston’s direction and the performances of the cast. 

If you have never seen it, or it has been a number of years, The Man Who Would Be King is must viewing.   A poignant epic, with touches of charm and humor, and a revealing vision of the Empire of Victorian Britain.

The Son of God goes forth to war,
a kingly crown to gain;
his blood red banner streams afar:
who follows in his train?
Who best can drink his cup of woe,
triumphant over pain,
who patient bears his cross below,
he follows in his train.

Thanks again, Moe!!

****************************

And a wonderful insight from Billy Fish!

5 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, army, guns, history, islam, SIR!, Uncategorized, veterans, war

Question for the Gang: What is the Most Beautiful Warship Ever?

indiana bb58

One of the great things about being able to write for this or any other blog is the ability to ask questions with the purpose of drawing out opinions and generating discussion amongst knowledgeable readers.

The question I pose today is the following:

In your opinion, what was the most beautiful warship ever built?

Defining “beauty” in an instrument of war may seem a contradiction, but to the denizens here and elsewhere who are either Naval enthusiasts or have been to sea on a warship, there is an instinctive reaction to the sight of a graceful and well-balanced vessel that exudes power and strength.

Beauty, also being in the eye of the beholder, still has some qualifiers on this first offering:

  • The ship (for this round, at least) must be a capital ship, a fleet carrier, battleship, battle cruiser, armored cruiser, guided missile cruiser, or heavy cruiser.
  • The ship must be primarily steam-powered and of steel/iron construction.

Note that neither design success nor combat record is a part of any consideration.   This is not about the most effective fighting vessel, but rather the most aesthetically pleasing.

My offerings below are not at all exhaustive, and I encourage any additional input for which class or one-off ship strikes your sense of beauty.  That said, one can likely easily spot some of my biases in my selections.  The “clipper” or “Atlantic” bow.  Funnel caps.  I could think of no pre-Dreadnoughts that were beautiful ships.  Amphibs, either.  I offer only a single aircraft carrier class, as well.  I heavily favored guns, but not exclusively.  And there are a few selections that either precede or follow major rebuilds which make the vessels all but unrecognizable from their original design.  Which is good in one case, bad in another.

And I selected no French battleships.  They tend to be ugly affairs, with tumble-home sides and oddly-spaced machinery and funnels.  Even the Dunkerques and Richeleius, while significant improvements, suffer from the truncated appearance that plagued Nelson and Rodney, which are also not on my list.

Without further ado, grouped by country, below are my considerations for the most beautiful warships ever built.  Select from them, if you like, or offer your own choices.

Germany

ki05msez

Bismarck-class Battleships

scharnhorst1

Gneisenau-class Battlecruisers**

helgoland

Helgoland-class Second Generation Dreadnoughts

SMS_Derfflinger-ptqtr-top

Derfflinger-class Battlecruisers

Kriegsmarine-Cruiser-KMS-Prinz-Eugen-07

Hipper-class Heavy Cruisers**

Great Britain

04_hms_tiger

Battlecruiser Tiger

hms_qe_speed

Queen Elizabeth-class Super Dreadnoughts (As built)

hms-renown

Renown-class Battlecruisers

HMS_Hood_March_17_19241

Battlecruiser Hood

hms-vanguard-23_8

Battleship Vanguard

Japan

ijn_yamato_trials

Yamato-class Superbattleships

mogami_trials

Mikuma-class Heavy Cruisers

heavycruisermayacustomdy4

Maya-class Heavy Cruisers

Italy

Italian_battleship_Andrea_Doria

Andrea Doria-class Battleships (post-rebuild)

Italian_battleship_Roma_(1940)_starboard_bow_view

Vittorio Veneto-class Battleships

zara_heavy_cruiser

Zara-class Heavy Cruisers

The United States

saratoga cv3

Lexington-class Fleet Aircraft Carriers

BB-57_SouthDakota

South Dakota-class Battleships

alaska

Alaska-class Battlecruisers

Battleship-U.S.S.-Missouri

Iowa-class Battleships

des moines

Des Moines-class Heavy Cruisers

cg36california_01

California-class Nuclear Guided Missile Cruisers

France

duquesne4

Duquesne-class Heavy Cruisers

Suffren

Suffern-class Heavy Cruisers

Soviet Union/Russia

sverdlov-cut

Project-68 (Sverdlov)-class Heavy Cruisers

Kirov

Kirov-class Battlecruisers

So there you are, some suggestions for the most beautiful warships ever built.  Fire away, either with the ones I provided, or offer your own ideas.

(Next round will be Light Cruisers and Destroyers.)

** Both Gneisenaus and cruiser Hipper were completed with straight stem and no funnel cap.  The addition of the “clipper bow” and capped funnel was not considered a significant rebuild in either class/unit.

UPDATE and BUMPED: Now with a poll added. I’ll have to teach URR how to make one before the next round. Vote!

27 Comments

Filed under armor, Artillery, guns, history, navy, Personal, SIR!, Uncategorized, war

Shaky Shakespeare and Dead Plantagenets

richard III

I was perusing the periodicals in the *ahem* adjunct library this morning, when I came across this gem from NR:

Now is the winter of our disinterment

Made summer by the glare of media hype.

Here fought I manfully; now my remains

Are brought to light from ‘neath a parking lot.

And if the good interred with my bones

Be yet redeemed from Tudor calumny,

My shade receiving then strange new respect

It ne’er did win in life, ‘tis no surprise:

‘Twas ever thus with dead Plantagenets.

Now civil war gives way to MPs’ jests

And Englishmen drive Volvos to the mall

On blood-soaked ground o’er which I reigned, where shops

Sell chicken vindaloo with tea and scones.

Oh, cursed be he who parks upon my bones!

It actually made me LOL.   But with a tinge of lament for the Outlaw King.

 

Comments Off

Filed under history, Humor, SIR!, Uncategorized, war

More About Awards

Since there is no horse too dead, nor any cat too flat, let me suggest the following modifications to our Armed Forces awards chart:

Awards edits

Let’s have a look at the ones I would can, and why:

Defense Distinguished Service Medal- The same as the Distinguished Service Medal, except GOFOs get a separate one for doing something “joint”.  Rescind it, and either replace with the DSM, or the star for additional awards of DSM.

Defense Superior Service Medal- The “joint” equivalent to the Legion of Merit.  Another 0-6/GOFO bauble.  Get rid of it.  Award the Legion of Merit, or stars for additional awards.

Defense Meritorious Service Medal- You got it, the “joint” MSM.  Rescind.  Award MSM or stars for additional awards.

Joint Service Commendation Medal- Notice a trend here?  You have a service branch, presumably.  Make the Joint HQ convince your service branch that you rate your service branch’s Commendation Medal.  If they can’t, maybe you shouldn’t have one.   Certainly not some “joint” equivalent.  Rescind.

Joint Meritorious Unit Award- Precisely the same rationale as the JSCM above.  Except for the collective.  If your outfit was that good, your service branch should award as appropriate.

Global War on Terror Expeditionary Medal- Never understood creating an expeditionary medal for wars in which campaign medals were sure to be minted.  I might be able to see it for guys in the Philippines and elsewhere, not in IRQ or AFG.  BUT, we have the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for that.  Rescind, and replace it with the AFEM.

Global War on Terror Service Medal- This formerly held the position of “Dumbest New Award”, but has been overtaken by the Drone Medal.  Get rid of it.  They already have the National Defense Service Medal for those who didn’t deploy.  (Formerly known as the CNN Medal.  As in “You saw Desert Storm on CNN?  Me too!”)  Rescind without replacement with a current equivalent.

Armed Forces Service Medal- “Significant activity”?  Are you kidding me?  Rescind without replacement.

Humanitarian Service Medal- Another non-warfighter feel-good award.  Get rid of it.  After Hugo ripped through South Carolina, Marines from MCB helped out cutting and clearing trees, and delivering water, etc.  The base CSTAFF spent a formation droning (!) on and on about how they worked twelve hour days for two weeks to help out.   Meanwhile, the Drill Instructors continued their 140-hour work weeks for the entire two year tour.  So the Sgt from base motors was awarded this thing while my Sgt Senior Drill Instructor got zilch, and had his NCM downgraded to a NAM.

Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal- Makes the Humanitarian Service Medal look like the Iron Cross.  Away with it.

Overseas Service Ribbon- Another “everybody gets one” trinket.  You were PCS overseas, with all the concomitant bennies that the UDP bubbas pumping to WESTPAC didn’t have.   Want a ribbon for being OCONUS?  Ride a gator freighter for 200 days.  Or do Camp Hansen unaccompanied.

Recruiting/Drill Instructor/Marine Security Guard Ribbons- Wrong, wrong, wrong.  No “special duty” ribbons on a Marine uniform.  Lousy idea from jump street, let’s get rid of them most rikki tik.

These are, of course, in addition to the Distinguished Warfare Medal, hereby unofficially known as the “Stays in Vegas” Medal.

Before you ask, yes, at least three of these are ones I am authorized.   By comparison, my Dad came home from the Pacific, after eleven landings and almost three years, with four ribbons.  One was a Navy Good Cookie, and another was the Asiatic-Pacific Theater Ribbon with four battle stars.   Along with a PUC.  He got a WWII Victory Medal on his way out in ’46.  In 1991, we had people sit at Al Jubayl for two weeks and come home with five.

amin_dada_lgdownload

It would do us well to have senior Officers that look like warriors instead of Idi Amin, or BG McSoulpatch.   Just sayin’.  Any others I failed to mention that should go?

18 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Air Force, army, history, iraq, marines, navy, SIR!, stolen valor, stupid, Uncategorized, war

Quick Quiz

Box

The above box displays which of the following:

          a)  The view out my window for the next couple days

          b) The sum total of my contributions to this blog since Tuesday

c) Both a) and b)

I know.   I need to get my ass moving on my next post.

12 Comments

Filed under SIR!, stupid, Uncategorized

Women in Combat Arms: The Perspective of a Warrior

The Late General Robert H. Barrow, former Commandant of the Marine Corps, winner of the Navy Cross, Distinguished Service Cross, Silver Star, Bronze Star, Veteran of three wars, World War II, Korea, and Vietnam, speaks on the notion of women in ground combat units.  Thirteen and a half minutes.  (The last three are dark screen.) Listen to it all.

Those who would dismiss General Barrow as hidebound, sexist, closed-minded, or any other of the various derogatory labels that tend to be employed by the feminists who push such agendas should feel a tinge of shame.  If they are capable of such, which I doubt.

Those who comprise the Joint Chiefs of Staff, particularly CJCS Dempsey, CSA Ordierno, and Marine Commandant Amos, should be ashamed of themselves.  They must know deep down that what a man like General Barrow asserts is the brutal truth.  Yet they have nodded their heads in enthusiastic agreement with their political masters as a sop to the feminists and progressives who despise our military and everything it stands for.  Gentlemen, you must do some serious soul searching.    You KNOW that General Barrow speaks an unvarnished truth honed by 41 years of wartime service and leadership of men in some of the most bitter combat of the 20th Century.   Are your current assignments and your careers so much more important than the lives of those you will unnecessarily risk to implement this corrosive policy?

The Commandant’s assertion that “we will maintain our high standards while ensuring maximum success for every Marine” smacks of the dishonesty of the “everyone gets a trophy” Left.   War, we damned well should know, knows no such considerations.   If we didn’t have such morally and intellectually bankrupt leadership spending so much time and money painting the Potemkin Village instead of training to win our nation’s wars, we would not find ourselves in the current fix.

4 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Air Force, armor, army, Artillery, girls, history, infantry, iraq, marines, navy, obama, Politics, recruiting, SIR!, stupid, Uncategorized, war

Op-For: Mattis Being Pushed Out?

James-Mattis-articleInline

A network of ruggedly handsome Marine Artillerists keeping an eye on the world is an invaluable commodity.  LTCOL P over at Op-For alerted me to Tom Ricks’ post this morning over at FP regarding near-legendary Marine General James N. Mattis.  Some telling statements from Ricks, an avowed Obama supporter.

CIVIL-MILITARY SIGNALS: The message the Obama Administration is sending, intentionally or not, is that it doesn’t like tough, smart, skeptical generals who speak candidly to their civilian superiors. In fact, that is exactly what it (and every administration) should want.

And:

SERVICE RELATIONS: The Obamites might not recognize it, but they now have dissed the two Marine generals who are culture heroes in today’s Corps: Mattis and Anthony Zinni. The Marines have long memories. I know some who are still mad at the Navy for steaming away from the Marines left on Guadalcanal.

If Ricks is finally admitting to Obama’s “smartest man in the room” act precluding his desire for informed advice, things have gotten damned bad.

…I am at the point where I don’t trust his national security team. They strike me as politicized, defensive and narrow. These are people who will not recognize it when they screw up, and will treat as enemies anyone who tells them they are doing that. And that is how things like Vietnam get repeated. Harsh words, I know. But I am worried.

The rest of us have been for a while, Tom.  ”Three bags full” has been the standard answer from senior military leadership regarding the social experimentation, group punishment knee-jerk overreactions to perceived discipline problems, and US Pol-Mil actions (or non-actions) in Libya.  Casey with Fort Hood, Dempsey in any number of situations.  Mabus bankrupting the Navy for a green-fuel pat on the head.  Why would he think such would not bleed over into strategic decision-making?

I don’t know if military action against Iran is the right course or not, but casting away men like Mattis and Zinni (and driving off Jim Jones) won’t do much to get him informed advice.  Coupled with the amateur-hour soup sandwich that is Foggy Bottom, the ship of state is running without charts into the shoals.   They may make Johnson-McNamara-Bundy look like a well-oiled machine, and George W. Bush look positively like Metternich.

4 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Air Force, army, Around the web, Artillery, history, Iran, iraq, islam, marines, navy, obama, Politics, SIR!, war

The Ordeal of USS Hugh W. Hadley

0577410

0577417

As US Army and Marine forces reduced the island of Okinawa in the spring of 1945, the Japanese unleashed a desperate storm of suicide attacks, the infamous kamikaze, on the massed armada of supporting allied warships offshore.  It did not take the Japanese long to understand the significance of the line of destroyers that ringed the island, their air search radars detecting and warning of the approach of Japanese aircraft from Formosa, Kyushu, and other locations to attack the US 5th (later 3rd) Fleet.

Soon, duty on the Radar Pickets became among the most deadly and dangerous of the entire war.   “Roger Peter” stations were subject to withering attacks, as the Japanese sought to blind the Americans and strike the carriers and transports that supported operations ashore.   A grimly high number of US ships were sunk, with heavy loss of life, in order to maintain the ring of warning radars that shielded the invasion fleet.   Drexler, Bush, Emmons, Little, Morrison, Luce, Pringle, all were sacrificed to alert the fleet of the impending kamikaze strikes.  And Mannert L. Abele, smashed by two massive precision-guided missiles that portended a coming age.    Many other ships were savagely mauled, Aaron Ward, Hazelwood, the famous Laffey, Cassin Young.  Damaged so severely that their survival astonished those who witnessed their suffering.

On the morning of the 11th of May, 1945, USS Hugh W. Hadley DD-774, took up station at Roger Peter Station 15.   When the fateful hours had passed, Hugh W. Hadley had been struck by three suicide aircraft, and had lost 28 killed and 67 wounded.  Though her guns had downed more than twenty enemy aircraft, damage to Hadley was severe and extensive.  One of those aircraft which struck the destroyer was a piloted rocket bomb, the infamous Okha (“Cherry Blossom”) that had spelled doom for Abele.  (And referred to in the below report as “Baka”.)   With a warhead three times that of modern ASCMs and a dive speed of Mach .85, an Okha presented an incredibly formidable challenge.

05774040577405

05774060577407

Okha('Baka')BombUnderGuardYontanAirfieldOkinawa

From here, I will let the Captain of that magnificent ship tell the story.  The following is Commander Mullaney’s Battle Report in full:

DD774/A16/a1
Serial O66
U.S.S. HUGH W. HADLEY (DD774)
c/o Fleet Post Office
San Francisco, California

15 May 1945

From:                        The Commanding Officer, U.S.S. HUGH W. HADLEY (DD774)

To:                             The Commander in Chief, U. S. Fleet.

Via:                            (1) Commander, Task Group 51.5
(2) Commander, Task Force 51
(3) Commander, Fifth Fleet
(4) Commander in Chief, Pacific Fleet.

Subject:                    ACTION REPORT – Action against enemy aircraft attacking
this ship, while on Radar Picket Station
Number Fifteen, off Okinawa, Nansei
Shoto, 11 May 1945.

Enclosure:                (A)  Executive Officer’s Report.
(B)  Fighter Director’s Report.
(C)  Battle Damage Report.

                                      Because of the large number of planes involved, in this extended engagement, the Commanding Officer appointed a Board of Officers to receive statements from key witnesses, verify all reports, prevent duplications and establish the  facts of the action in order to assist the Commanding Officer in making an accurate report. On this basis the below  report has been submitted.

                                                                                               Part I

            1.  The U.S.S. HUGH W. HADLEY (DD774) was assigned duty as RADAR PICKET SHIP AND FIGHTER DIRECTOR SHIP on Station #15 of Okinawa, Nansei Shoto, 10 May 1945.  Ships in company were the U.S.S. EVANS (DD552), LCS 82, LCS(L) 83, LCS(L) 84, and LSM(R) 193 as support ships.  The Evans turned over duties as Tactical Command to the Hadley.

            2.  The MISSION of this group of ships was to detect and report approaching enemy aircraft, to control the assigned Combat Air Patrol, and to prevent enemy planes from reaching the transport area at Okinawa.

            3.  On the night of 10 May, an enemy plane attacked our formation at 1935 and was taken under fire by both.  The Evans reported seeing it destroyed.  Throughout the night the ship was at General Quarters due to the threatening movements and a few attacks by enemy planes in the immediate vicinity of the formation.

            4.  On the morning of 11 May, at 0605, the Combat Air Patrol of twelve planes reported on station.  At about 0740, bogies were reported to the north-east.  At 0745, a large enemy float plane appeared through the mist and was taken under fire by both ships.  Soon, this plane headed away from the Evans and came directly for the Hadley which was about one and a half miles from the Evans.  This plane was shot down by the Hadley at the range of 1200 yards. .

            5.  At about 0755, numerous enemy planes were contacted by our instruments as coming towards the ship (and Okinawa) from the north, distance about 55 miles.  One division of CAP was ordered out to intercept.  Shortly thereafter, several enemy formations were detected, and the entire CAP was ordered out to intercept.  Our Fighter Director Officer in CIC has estimated that the total number of enemy planes were 156 coming in at different heights in groups as follows: Raid ONE 36, Raid TWO 50, Raid THREE 2O, Raid FOUR 20 to 30, Raid FIVE 20, Total 156 planes.

            6.  At about 0755 the entire Combat Air Patrol was ordered out in different formations to intercept and engage the hordes of enemy planes closing us and shortly we received reports from them that they had destroyed twelve planes.  Then they were so busy that they could not send us reports but we intercepted their communications to learn about forty to fifty planes were destroyed them.  CIC reported that there were no friendly planes within ten miles of this ship.

            7.  From this time on the Hadley and the Evans were attacked continuously by numerous enemy aircraft coming at us in groups of four to six planes on each ship. During the early period, enemy aircraft were sighted trying to pass our formation headed for Okinawa.  These were flying extremely low on both bows and seemingly ignoring us.  The Hadley shot down four of these.

            8.  The tempo of the engagement and the maneuver of the two destroyers at high speed was such as to cause the Hadley and the Evans to be separated by distances as much as two and three miles.  This resulted in individual action by both ships.  Three times the Hadley suggested to the Evans to close for mutual support and efforts were made to achieve his but each time the attacks prevented the ships from closing each other.  The Hadley closed the four small ships several times during the engagement.

             9.  From 0830 to 0900 the Hadley was attacked by groups of planes coming in on both bows.  Twelve enemy planes were shot down by the Hadley’s guns during this period, at times firing all guns in various directions.  The Evans which, at this time, was a distance of about three miles to the northward, was seen fighting off a number of planes by herself, several of which were seen to be destroyed.  At 0900 the Evans was hit and put out of action.  At one time toward the close of the battle friendly planes were closing in to assist us, the four support ships were prevented from shooting down two friendlies whom they they had taken under fire.  One plane was seen to splash inside their formation due to their own gunfire. however, I am not able to give an accurate account of their action.  They were very helpful in picking up my crew who were in the water, in coming alongside and removing wounded and in helping to pump.        

            10.  From this time on, the Hadley received the bulk of the attacks and action became furious with all guns firing at planes on all sides of the ship.  CIC reported that the SUGAR GEORGE radar scope was filled with enemy planes.  The Commanding Officer saw that the situation was becoming too much for one ship to handle and he ordered the Combat Air Patrol to close the formation and assist us.  With outstanding courage, our planes fearlessly closed the ships and attacked enemy planes.  They achieved great results and when the Hadley was finally helpless in the water our crew was sparked with renewed courage by the sight of airmen driving off the remaining enemy aircraft.

             11.  For 20 minutes, the Hadley fought off the enemy single-handed being separated from the Evans, which was out of action, by three miles and the four small support ships by two miles.  Finally, at 0920, ten enemy planes which had surrounded the Hadley, four on the starboard bow under fire by the main battery and machine guns, four on the port bow under fire by the forward machine guns, and two astern under fire by the aft machine guns, attacked the ship simultaneously. All ten planes were destroyed in a remarkable fight and each plane was definitely accounted for.  As a result of this attack, the Hadley was: (1) Hit by a bomb aft (2) By a BAKA bomb seen to be released from a low flying BETTY (3) Was struck by a suicide plane aft (4) Hit by a suicide plane in rigging.

              12.  The ship was badly holed and immediately both engine rooms and one fireroom were flooded and the ship settled down and listed rapidly.  All five-inch guns were out of action, a fire was raging aft of number two stack, ammunition was exploding, and the entire ship was engulfed in a thick black smoke which forced the crew to seek safety, some by jumping over the side, others by crowding forward and awaiting orders.  The ship was helpless to defend herself and at this time the situation appeared hopeless.  The Commanding Officer received reports from the Chief Engineer and the Damage Control Officer which indicated that the main spaces were flooded and that the ship was rapidly developing into a condition which would capsize her.  The exploding ammunition and the raging fire appeared to be extremely dangerous. The engineers were securing the forward boilers to prevent them from blowing up.  The order to “prepare to abandon Ship” was given and life rafts and floats were put over the side.  A party of about fifty men and officers were being organized to make a last fight to save the ship and the remainder of the crew and the wounded were put over into the water.

              13.  From this point on, a truly amazing, courageous and efficient group of men and officers with utter disregard for their own personal safety approached the explosions and the fire with hoses and for fifteen minutes kept up this work.  The torpedoes were jettisoned, weights removed from the starboard side and, finally the fire was extinguished and the list and flooding controlled and the ship was saved.  Although the ship was still in an extremely dangerous condition, one fireroom bulkhead held and she was finally towed safely to the IE SHIMA anchorage.

               14.  The total number of enemy planes destroyed by the Hadley in this period, of one hour and thirty-five minute of continual firing was twenty-three.  This number includes twenty shot down to the water and three suicide hits.

               15.  Our mission was accomplished.  The transports at the Okinawa anchorage were saved from attack by one hundred and fifty sixty enemy planes by the action of our ships.  We bore the brunt of the enemy action and absorbed what they threw at us. It was a proud day for Destroyer men.

PART II

                 The U.S.S. HUGH W. HADLEY (DD774) was OTC of a force consisting of two destroyers, three LCSs and one LSM. In order to achieve maneuverability and concentrated gunfire the following formation was ordered: the four support ships to a diamond formation on a circle one thousand yards in diameter, speed ten knots, reversing course every half hour; the destroyers in a column distance fifteen hundred yards, speed fifteen knots.  When attacks commenced both destroyers increased speed to twenty seven knots and maneuvered in vicinity of supports to concentrate gunfire.

PART III

                  WEATHER: Wind and sea calm, visibility to the north and east unlimited, visibility to the west cloudy and mist haze.  During the attack the force maneuvered to the east and south to get out of the misty haze in order to see the enemy planes more clearly.  The haze to the west would not have prevented the enemy planes from seeing us.

                  Communications: Communications were satisfactory in all respects during the battle except that gunfire caused the jacks to pop out of the receiver panel in the radio central feeding radio to CIC. 

                                                                                                 PART IV 

                   ORDNANCE:  A. The performance of ordnance material and equipment was excellent.  The fire discipline was strict, gunnery communications rapid and effective. Ammunition expended:

   509 rounds 5″ 38 Caliber VT
   292 rounds 5″ 38 Caliber AA
 8950 rounds 40MM HET 
 3980 rounds 20MM HEI
 2010 rounds 20MM HEIT
   801 charges smokeless power

                    B.  The first bomb estimated to be a medium bomb, exploded with considerable flash killing a defense personnel topside aft.

                       2.  The suicide plane hit aft number two stack and plunged to the deck below.  There was a tremendous explosion from this crash which result in a raging fire with ammunition exploding.  The topside compartments in this area were all completely wrecked.

                       3.  BAKA BOMB this is the bomb which put the ship out of action.  It was led in a raging fire with ammunition exploding.  It was released from a large lumbering BETTY which came in from astern during the final attack, altitude about 600 feet.  The bomb appeared to be about one and one half times as large as a 21″ torpedo.  On each side were very short stubby wings about one third the usual wing length of a lane.  There was no engine.  The bomb struck the ship on the starboard side at frame number 105, which is the bulkhead between forward engine room and after fireroom.  The explosion from this bomb terrific and some decks were lifted about twenty inches causing ankles and knees to be broken or strained.  Three large engineering spaces were immediately flooded and the ship settled in the water rapidly.  Another result of this explosion was to put all equipment including the 5″ guns out of action.

                                                                                             PART V

                      A.  Damage to our own ship -see Battle Damage Report.

                      B.  Battle damage to enemy units: Twenty-three enemy planes destroyed as follows:

Time ( approximate)  Relative Bearing    Distance    Number
0745    090 1500 yards            1
0800    270 6000 yards closing         2
0810    050 4000 yards closing         2
0825    060 4000 yards closing         2
0835    060 4000 yards closing         2
0835    270 Dive         1
0845    060 3-4000 yards closing         2
0845    225 Dive         1
0905-0920    045 Dive         4
   270 Dive         4
   180 Dive         2    

                                                                                               PART VI

                      ENEMY TACTICS:  The enemy planes employed no special tactics except during the final attack to surround the ship and dive simultaneously.

                      OWN TACTICS: The ship was maneuvered at twenty-seven knots constantly using the rudder to present the maximum guns to the enemy.  One dive bomber at 0835 was missed by putting hard rudder over when the plane was 1000 yards above us coming in.  The stern was swung away from his point of aim and he crashed twenty feet from the ship’s stern.

                                                                                                PART VII

                      PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE AND CASUALTIES:

                      1.  Killed in action twenty-eight; wounded in action sixty-seven; missing in action none.

                      2.  No Captain of a man of war ever had a crew who fought more valiantly against such overwhelming odds.  Who can measure the degree of courage of men, who stand up to their guns in the face of diving planes that destroy them?  Who can measure the loyalty of a crew who risked death to save the ship from sinking when all seemed lost?   I desire to record that the history of our Navy was enhanced on 11 May 1945.  I am proud to record that I know no record of a Destroyer’s crew fighting for one hour and thirty five minutes against overwhelming enemy aircraft attacks and destroying twenty three planes. My crew accomplished their mission and displayed outstanding fighting abilities.  I am recommending awards for the few men who displayed outstanding bravery above the deeds of their shipmates in separate correspondence.  Destroyer men are good men and my officers and crew were good destroyer men..

                     3.  It can be recorded that the aviators who comprised the Combat Air Patrol assigned to the Hadley gave battle to the enemy that rank with the highest traditions of our Navy’s history.  When the leader was asked to close and assist us, he replied, “I am out of ammunition but I am sticking with you”.  He then proceeded to fly his plane at enemy planes attacking in attempt to head them off.  toward the end of the battle, I witnessed one Marine pilot attempting to ride off a suicide plane.  This plane hit us but not vitally.  I am willing to take my ship to the shores of Japan if I could have these Marines with me.

                                                                                                PART VIII

                      LESSONS LEARNED, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

                      1.  It must be impressed that constant daily drills in damage control using all personnel on the ship and especially those who are not in the regular damage control parties will prove of  value when emergencies occur.  The various emergency pumps which were on board were used effectively to put out fires.  Damage control schools proved their great value and every member of the crew is now praising this training.

                      2.  I was amazed at the performance of the 40 and 20 guns.  Contrary to my expectation, those smaller guns shot down the bulk of the enemy planes. Daily the crews had dinned into their minds the following order “LEAD THAT  PLANE”.  Signs were painted at the gun stations as follows “LEAD THAT PLANE”.  It worked, they led and the planes flew right through our projectiles.

                      3.  The Commanding Officer recommends that the torpedoes be removed from ships which are assigned Amphibious and Radar Picket duties.  He believes that what is left of the enemy fleet will be taken care of by other Task Forces, or the Air.  Replace the heavy weights of torpedo mounts with larger CIC, more RADAR and 40mm gun mounts. In order to function properly, Radar Picket Ships must be loaded with special equipment.  In other words, he believes that amphibious ships who are to be assigned to this duty should be specially equipped for this duty and not just generally equipped for regular destroyer duty.

Untitled

cc: ComDesRon66
ComDesPac

There is much discussion these days regarding many things Navy.    The nature of combat in the littorals.  The necessary firepower to defeat a saturation attack.   Networking a force.  The level of training and proficiency of ships’ crews, the size of those crews, the necessity to operate, fight, and perform damage control simultaneously.    The imbuing of a spirit of courage and sacrifice, and a warrior ethos necessary to endure the furnace of combat.  And the value of a tough, powerful, sturdy, versatile warship that can dish out and take the punishment,  and bring her crew home.

The Captain’s touching tribute to his Sailors should be learned verbatim by every Sailor in our Navy.  And his praise of pilots of the CAP show that integrated operations were not invented after Goldwater-Nichols.

I am in awe of the Sailors and Officers of Hugh W. Hadley.   Should there be any still with us today, they would tell you that they are not heroes.   But I can think of no better definition of the word.

12 Comments

Filed under Air Force, army, Artillery, guns, history, infantry, marines, navy, planes, SIR!, war

Load HEAT- Santa’s Helper Edition

There are twelve days and nights of Christmas.  So, I present to you visions of some very nice sugar plums to dance in your head.   There are even workshops, apparently, to help these lovelies learn to North Pole-dance.

8c473295-faf4-49e4-944d-69ceddbe40a92675d4c1-1438-490e-9ff9-6da3992c2c3f

Those stockings appear to have been hung with considerable care.

b4066e79-0690-4d45-9377-6ad303991f6c80460356

Lovely ornaments.  And look!  Mistletoe.

b9156c0e-1dff-43a4-8bea-027f21c0c511630868_1b3c9098-d8b6-486a-bf5b-38981060efe2_prod

Baby’s first Christmas?  She seems nervous.  Oh, and save that wrapping.  It’s expensive!

3f5057c1-462b-40fb-8eab-077686a61dfc0ca739f3-7a25-449c-8b37-d7aa9eb11767

Sensible fur linings.  It’s cold at the North Pole.  Yes, that’s Jessica on the right.

ee56e4a5-c291-4113-940b-3d7140491c0858

Getting those down the chimney is part of the magic of Christmas morning.

1081

Oh, those reindeer games.  And didn’t you used to get a lump of coal when you were naughty?  Or is she the gift for being nice?

Merry Christmas, everybody!   May you get just what you want this year!   HO! HO! HO!  There, I said it!

9 Comments

Filed under girls, Humor, Load Heat, marines, Personal, SIR!, Uncategorized

James L. Stone, Medal of Honor Recipient for Korea Heroism, Dies at 89

We have lost another hero.   Muffled drums and the slow march for Colonel James L. Stone, United States Army, who received the Medal of Honor for his heroism along the Imjin River in Korea with 8th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division in November of 1951.   He has died in Arlington, Texas at the age of 89.

Read his citation.   Courage that defies description.   May we have those among us now who are capable of as much.

Godspeed, Colonel.

Comments Off

Filed under army, history, SIR!, Uncategorized, war

XBrad’s Birthday!

Our gracious host has a birthday today.   That is so cool.   It is the quintessential warrior birthday.  25 October.

I spose I have The Battle of Newmarket, which was one hundred years to the day before I was born, 15 May 1864.    But XBRAD gets:

  • Agincourt, 1415
  • Balaclava,  (Charge of the Light Brigade) 1854
  • Mine Creek, 1864
  • Russian Revolution, 1917
  • El Alamein, 1942
  • Santa Cruz (beginning) 1942
  • Samar/Leyte Gulf 1944
  • Grenada, 1983

That is a lotta military history, some of it momentous.  He appreciates it, at least.  It would be maddening if he didn’t, like the six-foot seven kid who “didn’t like basketball”.

13 Comments

Filed under history, planes, SIR!, Uncategorized, war

Tall and proud, just like Rodney Davis | Ed Grisamore | Macon.com

Andy from the H2 brings us this story of Macon, Georgia’s Medal of Honor recipient and the men who traveled to this Marine’s hometown to honor him.

Sgt. Rodney M. Davis

Davis was a platoon guide with Company B, First Battalion, Fifth Marines, First Marine Division on September 6, 1967 during Operation Swift. His company came under heavy fire from the Viet Cong. When a grenade rolled into their trench, Davis threw himself on it, saving the lives of his companions. Those survivors came to Macon on what would have been Davis’ 70th birthday.

He was the first black Vietnam veteran to have a Navy ship named in his honor, an Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate commissioned in 1987 and still sailing today. Go read the whole thing.

via Tall and proud, just like Rodney Davis | Ed Grisamore | Macon.com.

Comments Off

Filed under history, marines, SIR!

Uniformly Stupid? Part 2

See Part 1 here.

I’m on the road, so I’ll be doing some “best of” posts. Right now, this is the most searched for post. 

While most people in the Army spend just about all their time in a working uniform like the ACU, there are occasions when something a little more formal is needed.

Since the late 1950s the standard Army Service and Dress uniform for most soldiers has been the Army Green Uniform. Folks in the Army almost universally refer to it as “Class A’s”.

When the uniform jacket is removed, the Army Green Uniform can be worn as the Class B uniform, suitable for most office environment jobs. When I served as a recruiter, most days we wore the Class B.

No, that's not me...

No, that's not me...

The problem with the Army Green Uniform was simple. It was ugly as sin in church. There was an alternative, however, one with a great history dating back practically to the first days of the Army. The Dress Blue Uniform.

Female Officer and Male Enlisted Service Dress Blues

Female Officer and Male Enlisted Service Dress Blues

There’s a reason why the trousers are a different shade blue from the coat. Back in the days of the Old West, when cavalry troopers wore the blue uniform as there work clothes, they would routinely remove their coat, roll it up and carry it strapped to the back of the saddle. The trousers faded from the sunlight and wear and tear, but the coat didn’t. Hence the difference.

Service Dress Blues were always an optional item for enlisted personnel. You could buy them, but you didn’t have to. Since they cost a lot of money and there were relatively few occasions to wear them, most junior folks did without.

Back in 2005 or so, the Chief of Staff of the Army made the decision to do away with the Army Green Uniform and modify the Blue uniform to replace it.The new variations are shown below.

The Army Blue Uniform

The Army Blue Uniform

Personally, I wish they had done this about 25 years ago. I always hated the Green Uniform, and as soon as I could, bought a set of Blues. And anytime I had a chance to wear them, I did. One fairly common occasion was the “Dining Out”. A Dining Out is when a unit, typically a battalion, has a formal banquet, with spouses and sweethearts invited*. This is a social occasion run on military lines- the colors are presented, the chaplain gives the invocation, there are a couple of (usually brief) speeches, and maybe some awards and recognitions. Then there is usually some dancing. The important thing is, your best girl gets a chance to put on her best dress and go out to be seen. Chicks dig that.  Since a lot of guys didn’t own Dress Blues, they made do with the Army Green Uniform with a white shirt and a bow tie.

Your author, center, in Dress Blues, flanked by two friends in Class A's.

Your author, center, in Dress Blues, flanked by two friends in Class A's.

Incredibly, I managed to save this picture, but lost the picture of my date. You’ll have to take my word for it that she was stunning. Really. The two guys in the photo were great friends and fellow warriors, but neither was all that attractive….

*You could invite your spouse, or your sweetheart, but NOT your spouse and your sweetheart…

10 Comments

Filed under 120mm, Afghanistan, anthropology, armor, army, ARMY TRAINING, Around the web, ducks, gaza, Georgia, girls, guns, history, infantry, Iran, iraq, islam, israel, Load Heat, marines, navy, obama, ossettia, Personal, planes, Politics, recruiting, SIR!, space, stolen valor, stupid, Uncategorized, war

Happy birthday, President Reagan

Roamy here.  On the 100th anniversary of the birth of Ronald Reagan, I thought I’d ask y’all for your thoughts on his Presidency. 

My friend Swamp Heathen #1 is a great admirer of Reagan, mainly because he served in the Army under both Carter and Reagan.  He says in the late 70′s, they couldn’t get parts for repair at his Hawk missile site in West Germany, and there’s nothing worse than sitting there, knowing the Soviets are on the other side of the line, and if they come across, there’s not a damn thing you can do about it.  All that changed with Reagan.

Another friend left the Army in the 90′s, before retirement, saying “it’s not Ronnie’s army any more.”

Your thoughts?

I think I’m going to go watch Hellcats of the Navy.

3 Comments

Filed under history, SIR!

Coffee, Part Duex

So it came to pass that not only was I living the relatively cushy life of mech infantry trooper, I was actually assigned to Brigade Headquarters as the driver for the brigade’s XO. I was about as far to the rear as you could get and still expect to get dust on your boots when you went to the field (but none of that icky mud, thankyouverymuch!).

And I still loved coffee. And not only that, I had a very nice Chevy Blazer that I only occasionally had to share with my boss, the wonderful LTC Oz. Now, LTC Oz was a good man-smart, tough, personable and likeable, and a born teacher and motivator. But he almost died a horrible death one day. Because he took my coffee.

One of the brighter things I did when I was assigned to brigade was to run to the Post Exchange to buy a thermos. And not just any thermos. I bought the biggest, baddest, toughest stainless steel Stanley thermos I could find. This thing was the M-1 tanks of thermoses (thermii? thermos’?) And as a part of my personal checklist before going out the gate of the motor pool, I would fill the thermos with boiling water for a half hour or so to pre-heat it, then empty it, and fill it with scalding hot coffee. And then I would crank down the lid as tight as I could, and store the thermos wrapped in warm cloth in my center console. That thermos would keep the coffee fresh and hot. While everyone else in headquarters was drinking the tepid crap left over from dinner, I could pop that thing open after two days in the field and have a nice, hot fresh cup of coffee. If I was careful, it would keep coffee hot for up to 3 days.

Now, LTC Oz, as I’ve mentioned, was a good man. And my real job, more so than just driving the truck, was to take care of him, and relieve him of distractions that kept him from focusing on his duties to the brigade.  I wasn’t his servant, or his batman (I don’t care who you are, I’m not shining your boots, or cleaning your weapon), but I did attend to housekeeping chores for him, such as putting up and taking down his tent, making sure he got meals (if he didn’t have time to run through the chow  line, I’d eat, then go through again and grab him a plate), and making sure he had all the little things like maps, mapboards, pens, and radio frequency/call sign cheat-sheets.  I’d make sure the truck was set up just the way he liked it for when  we’d roll out on inspection tours every morning. And since he was a good man, and a good officer, I enjoyed performing my duties to the best of my ability.

But I made a small error one day. I left my thermos on top of the center console of the truck.  LTC Oz, seeing a nice big thermos, managed to convince himself I was in a generous, sharing mood. So while I was freezing my tuchus off taking down his tent and packing up his baggage, I thought he was off doing all the high-speed officer stuff he did (you know, making Captains on the brigade staff miserable and talking on the radio or phone). Instead, that son of a bitch gun was sitting in the truck drinking the rest of my coffee.

I’d been anticipating a nice hot cup of coffee all morning. I was madder than a wet hen when I got back and found a nice warm officer and a cold empty thermos.

I may have said some intemperate things. What’s the statute of limitations for UCMJ infractions?

8 Comments

Filed under ARMY TRAINING, SIR!